首页> 外文学位 >Structural regulation, concentration, and democratization: A political economic analysis of the National Television Station Ownership rule.
【24h】

Structural regulation, concentration, and democratization: A political economic analysis of the National Television Station Ownership rule.

机译:结构调整,集中和民主化:对国家电视台所有权规则的政治经济学分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation uses a political economic approach to analyze the rhetoric surrounding debates of the National Television Station Ownership rule (NTSO) and the actual and potential consequences of increased media concentration. The study utilizes this interpretive empirical method to examine the historical context of the debates, their significance within the current U.S. political economy, and the state's role in these deliberations.; The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) passed the NTSO rule in the 1940s with the belief that the rule would increase diversity of viewpoints and "fair" competition. But since at least the late 1970s, the rule has been viewed as an impediment to broadcasters' pursuit of the benefits of economies of scale. The continued relaxation of ownership rules such as the NTSO rule has, in part, led to the proliferation of media mergers, for rules that once inhibited large companies from merging have consistently been eased or eradicated in the name of competition.; At the micro-level, this study focuses on the history of the NTSO rule, the Viacom-CBS merger, and News Corporation's strategies for fulfilling the company's special interests. I argue that attacks upon structural regulations once created to prevent media concentration and Federal Communication Commission (FCC) acquiescence are quite alarming when we consider how essential the media are to the democratic political process: to inform the citizenry for purposes of self-governance. At the macro-level, this study focuses on how the logic of capitalism is indeed antithetical to democratic ideals. The short-term goal of media ownership reform via the state, while seemingly necessary to either decrease concentration or stabilize the current U.S. media structure, should be matched with long-term goals of social and economic justice, for democratization will be difficult to achieve if survival remains a constant challenge for a large portion of the U.S. population and an even greater proportion of the global population. As such, I present ways in which media activists can work for change within the current political economic system and propose possible alternatives to the capitalist media system.
机译:本文采用一种政治经济学的方法来分析围绕国家电视台所有权规则(NTSO)的辩论,以及增加媒体集中度的实际和潜在后果。该研究利用这种解释性的经验方法研究了辩论的历史背景,辩论在当前美国政治经济中的意义以及国家在这些辩论中的作用。联邦通信委员会(FCC)在1940年代通过了NTSO规则,并认为该规则将增加观点的多样性和“公平”竞争。但是至少从1970年代后期开始,该规则就一直被视为阻碍广播公司追求规模经济效益的障碍。 NTSO规则等所有权规则的持续放宽,在一定程度上导致了媒体合并的扩散,因为曾经以竞争为名而一贯地放松或消除了曾经禁止大公司合并的规则。在微观层面上,本研究侧重于NTSO规则的历史,维亚康姆与CBS的合并以及新闻集团实现公司特殊利益的策略。我认为,一旦制定了旨在防止媒体集中的结构性法规和联邦通信委员会(FCC)默许的攻击,当我们考虑到媒体对民主政治进程的重要性时,就相当令人震惊:为自治目的告知公民。在宏观层面上,这项研究集中于资本主义的逻辑确实与民主理想相对立。通过国家进行媒体所有权改革的短期目标,尽管似乎对于降低集中度或稳定当前的美国媒体结构是必要的,但应与社会和经济正义的长期目标相匹配,因为如果实现以下目标,民主化将难以实现对于美国大部分人口以及全球更大比例的人口来说,生存仍然是一项持续的挑战。因此,我提出了媒体积极分子在当前政治经济体系内为变革而努力的方式,并提出了资本主义媒体体系可能的替代方案。

著录项

  • 作者

    Proffitt, Jennifer M.;

  • 作者单位

    The Pennsylvania State University.;

  • 授予单位 The Pennsylvania State University.;
  • 学科 Mass Communications.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 228 p.
  • 总页数 228
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 传播理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号