首页> 外文学位 >Measuring the Quality of the Website User Experience.
【24h】

Measuring the Quality of the Website User Experience.

机译:衡量网站用户体验的质量。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Consumers spend an increasing amount of time and money online finding information, completing tasks, or making purchases. The quality of the website experience has become a key differentiator for organizations---affecting whether they purchase and their likelihood to return and recommend a website to friends. Two instruments were created to more effectively measure the quality of the website user experience to help improve the experience.;Three studies used Classical Test Theory (CTT) to create a new instrument to measure the quality of the website user experience from the website visitor's perspective. Data were collected over five years from more than 4,000 respondents reflecting on experiences with more than 100 websites. An eight-item questionnaire of website quality was created---the Standardized User Experience Percentile Rank Questionnaire (SUPR-Q). The SUPR-Q contains four factors: usability, trust, appearance, and loyalty. The factor structure was replicated across three studies, with data collected both during usability tests and retrospectively in surveys. There was evidence of convergent validity with existing questionnaires, including the System Usability Scale (SUS). An initial distribution of scores across the websites generated a database used to produce percentile ranks and make scores more meaningful to researchers and practitioners. In Study 4, a new set of data and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed the factor structure and generated alternative items that work on non--e-commerce websites. The SUPR-Q can be used to generate reliable scores in benchmarking websites, and the normed scores can be used to understand how well a website scores relative to others in the database.;A fifth study was designed to develop and evaluate guidelines regarding the quality of the user experience that could be judged by experts. Study 5 establishes a Calibrated Evaluator's Guide (CEG) for evaluators to review websites against a set of guidelines to predict perceptions of quality of website user experience. The CEG was refined from 105 to 37 items using the many-faceted Rasch model. The CEG was found to complement the SUPR-Q by providing a more detailed description of the website user experience. Suggestions for practical use and future research are discussed.
机译:消费者花费越来越多的时间和金钱在网上查找信息,完成任务或进行购买。网站体验的质量已成为组织的主要差异化因素-影响组织是否购买商品以及是否会返回并向朋友推荐网站。创建了两种工具来更有效地衡量网站用户体验的质量以帮助改善体验。;三项研究使用经典测试理论(CTT)创建了一种新的工具来从网站访问者的角度衡量网站用户体验的质量。五年来,我们从4000多个受访者那里收集了数据,这些数据反映了100多个网站的经验。创建了八项网站质量调查表-标准化用户体验百分等级问卷(SUPR-Q)。 SUPR-Q包含四个因素:可用性,信任度,外观和忠诚度。在三项研究中复制了因子结构,在可用性测试期间和回顾性调查中收集了数据。有证据表明现有问卷包括系统可用性量表(SUS)具有收敛性。分数在网站上的初始分布生成了一个数据库,该数据库用于产生百分位等级,并使分数对研究人员和从业人员更有意义。在研究4中,一组新的数据和验证性因素分析(CFA)确认了因素结构并生成了在非电子商务网站上有效的替代项目。 SUPR-Q可用于在基准网站中生成可靠的分数,而规范分数可用于了解网站相对于数据库中其他网站的分数。;第五项研究旨在制定和评估有关质量的准则可以由专家判断的用户体验。研究5建立了校准的评估者指南(CEG),供评估者根据一组准则对网站进行评估,以预测对网站用户体验质量的看法。使用多面Rasch模型将CEG从105项精炼到37项。发现CEG通过提供网站用户体验的更详细描述来补充SUPR-Q。讨论了实际使用和未来研究的建议。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sauro, Jeff.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Denver.;

  • 授予单位 University of Denver.;
  • 学科 Information science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 148 p.
  • 总页数 148
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号