首页> 外文学位 >Regard croise sur l'anthropologie et la litterature dans l'oeuvre de Michel Leiris.
【24h】

Regard croise sur l'anthropologie et la litterature dans l'oeuvre de Michel Leiris.

机译:米歇尔·莱里斯(Michel Leiris)的作品对人类学和文学的见识。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

My dissertation, "Michel Leiris's Writing: From Heretic Ethnography to literary Anthropology," recaptures the debate between anthropology and literature in light of the unprecedented upsurge of interest in primitive and non-industrialized societies by Parisian Avant-garde writers such as Andre Breton, Michel Leiris, Georges Bataille, and Roger Caillois. Rather than two separate fields governed by distinct rules, I argue that literature and anthropology share the same narrative protocols and, to a certain extent, similar objectives. I believe that there is an anthropological dimension within literature in the sense that the aim of anthropology, especially cultural anthropology, is to describe social behaviors and to examine what shapes civilizations. Building on James Clifford's Predicament of Culture (1988) and Michael Tausig's Mimesis and Alterity (1993) among others, I inscribe Leiris' work within the concept of reflexive anthropology, which increasingly acknowledges the validity of literary self-representation as an anthropological form. In addition, I propose to theorize literature as a system that could constitute an alternative way to address social issues. Therefore, my dissertation questions the hierarchical labels that are imposed on Leiris' writing and which suggest that the writer's ethnographic vocation remains distinct from and marginal to his autobiographical project. In other words, my work deconstructs the binary opposition literature/ethnography, redefining both concepts and suggesting that, on the contrary, epistemological complementarities are essential to the production of knowledge. In short, my dissertation addresses the issue of African representation in the light of Michel Leiris work.
机译:我的论文“米歇尔·莱里斯的著作:从异端人种学到文学人类学”,回顾了巴黎前卫作家如安德烈·布雷顿,米歇尔对原始社会和非工业化社会的空前兴趣,从而重新审视了人类学和文学之间的争论。 Leiris,Georges Bataille和Roger Caillois。我认为,文学和人类学没有相同的叙事协议,并且在一定程度上具有相似的目标,而不是由两个不同的领域由不同的规则支配。我认为文学中存在人类学方面的意义,因为人类学,尤其是文化人类学的目的是描述社会行为,并研究塑造文明的因素。在詹姆斯·克利福德(James Clifford)的文化困境(1988)和迈克尔·陶西格(Michael Tausig)的《模仿与改变》(1993)等基础上,我将莱里斯的作品铭记在反思人类学的概念之内,后者越来越认识到文学自我表征作为人类学形式的有效性。另外,我建议将文学理论化,作为可以解决社会问题的另一种方式。因此,我的论文对莱里斯的著作所强加的等级标签提出了质疑,这些标签暗示着作者的民族志学职业与他的自传作品截然不同且处于边缘地位。换句话说,我的作品解构了二元对立的文学/人种学,重新定义了两个概念,并提出相反的认识论互补对知识的产生至关重要。简而言之,我的论文根据米歇尔·莱里斯(Michel Leiris)的工作来探讨非洲的代表权问题。

著录项

  • 作者

    Samb, Mamadou M.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Minnesota.;

  • 授予单位 University of Minnesota.;
  • 学科 Modern language.;Romance literature.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 195 p.
  • 总页数 195
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:41:24

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号