首页> 外文学位 >Law and Society in the Dead Sea Scrolls.
【24h】

Law and Society in the Dead Sea Scrolls.

机译:死海古卷中的法律与社会。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The study of the legal texts found among the Dead Sea Scrolls benefits from a theoretical framework that is informed by contemporary legal scholarship. This dissertation undertakes a shift from the comparative approach, which focuses on parallels from either early Christian or early rabbinic sources, through exploration of four theoretical concepts: legal essentialism, intentionality, exclusion, and obligation. Legal essentialism is a new term proposed in chapter 1 as a substitute for previous terminology of "realism" (in contrast to "nominalism," called "legal formalism" in this study). This essentialism is then demonstrated in four aspects: time, space, hierarchy, and knowledge.;Chapter 2 examines the role of intention in the law as an important prism to understand the tensions created by and solutions found for the sectarians' legal essentialism. Using the work of Anscombe and Audi, the dissertation defines the concept of intention and separates it from desire and action. A special section examines the idiom "high hand" and distinguishes its biblical usage (primarily in Num 15), and its usage in the sectarian writings, primarily in 1QS.;The concept of exclusion is the focus of chapter 3, primarily through 4QMMT, and with many comparisons to 1QS. Through the work of legal scholars Dan-Cohen and Minow the role of exclusion in constituting the community and reflecting their legal essentialist stance is clarified. The role of emotions and rhetoric of emotions in exclusion is also explored in relation to contemporary theories of law and emotion. Finally, the dissertation distinguishes between permanent-static exclusions based on deformities and temporary-dynamic exclusions based on moral conduct. This distinction demonstrates the previously discussed roles of legal essentialism and intention in the law.;Chapter 4 examines obligation and commitment, borrowing the terms "transcendence" and "renunciation" from Rosabeth Moss Kanter. The tension between obligation to God and obligation to community is described using Kierkegaard, suggesting that this tension is mediated through interpretative authority in the sect.;The final chapter examines the laws of premarital sex in the Pentateuch and in 4Q159, 4QD and 11Q19 to examine the previous issues in a specific case study of legal interpretation and innovation, highlighting different motivations between a sectarian text (4QD) and a non-sectarian text (the Temple Scroll).;The conclusion highlights the benefits of applying contemporary theory in general and legal theory in particular to the study of ancient texts, and especially to the study of the Dead Sea Scrolls.
机译:对死海古卷中发现的法律文本的研究得益于当代法律学者提供的理论框架。本文通过比较四个方法,探索了四个基本概念:法律本质主义,故意性,排斥性和义务性,从而从比较方法侧重于从早期基督教或早期犹太教源头开始的比较。法律本质主义是在第1章中提出的新术语,用来代替以前的“现实主义”术语(与“名义主义”相对,在本研究中称为“法律形式主义”)。然后从时间,空间,等级和知识四个方面证明了这种本质主义。第二章探讨了意图在法律中的作用,作为理解宗派法律本质主义所产生的张力和解决方案的重要棱镜。本文利用安斯科姆和奥迪的作品,定义了意图的概念,并将其与欲望和行动分开。一个特殊的部分检查了“高手”这个成语,并区分了其在圣经中的用法(主要在数字15中),以及其在宗派著作中的用法,主要是在1QS中。排他的概念是第3章的重点,主要是通过4QMMT,并与1QS进行了很多比较。通过法律学者丹·科恩(Dan-Cohen)和米诺(Minow)的工作,明确了排斥在构成社区和反映其法律本质主义立场方面的作用。相对于当代法律和情感理论,还探讨了情感和情感修辞在排斥中的作用。最后,本文对基于畸形的永久静态排除与基于道德行为的暂时动态排除进行了区分。这种区别证明了先前讨论过的法律本质主义和意图在法律中的作用。;第4章通过从Rosabeth Moss Kanter借用“超越”和“放弃”一词来研究义务和承诺。使用基尔凯郭尔描述了对上帝的义务与对社区的义务之间的紧张关系,这表明这种紧张关系是通过该宗派的解释权进行调解的。最后一章考察了摩西五经和第4季159、4QD和11Q19的婚前性法律。法律解释和创新的特定案例研究中的前几期,强调了宗派文本(4QD)和非宗派文本(圣殿卷轴)之间的不同动机。;结论强调了将当代理论应用于一般和法律的好处该理论特别是对古代文献的研究,尤其是对死海古卷的研究。

著录项

  • 作者

    Amihay, Aryeh.;

  • 作者单位

    Princeton University.;

  • 授予单位 Princeton University.;
  • 学科 Jewish Studies.;Law.;Religion History of.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 316 p.
  • 总页数 316
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号