首页> 外文学位 >Academic library directors in the eyes of hiring administrators: A comparison of the attributes, qualifications, and competencies desired by chief academic officers with those recommended by academic library directors.
【24h】

Academic library directors in the eyes of hiring administrators: A comparison of the attributes, qualifications, and competencies desired by chief academic officers with those recommended by academic library directors.

机译:招聘管理人员眼中的高校图书馆馆长:首席学术官期望的属性,资格和能力与高校图书馆馆长推荐的属性,资格和能力的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Librarians have traditionally looked to Academic Library Directors (ALDs) to list what qualities make them good at what they do. Little research has sought the input of institutional administrators (who are the ones who hire ALDs) about what they look for when hiring ALDs. This study presented a list of qualities that had been rated by ALDs as being important for the position to institutional administrators with the responsibility of hiring library directors. These hiring administrators were asked to rate the qualities and to add to the list any qualities they felt were important. The means of their ratings were then compared with those of the library directors to see how closely the ratings of the two groups matched. The results showed that there was statistically significant agreement between the two groups, but also that there were important differences. The principal differences were that the hiring administrators tended to place more priority on ideological attributes (attributes based on professional orientations and ideals) while academic library directors rated experience as more important. The hiring administrators also added several attributes to the original list, including managing multiple priorities, being learning/student oriented (especially toward low achievers), being self-directed with a good work ethic, being able to relate effectively to all constituencies, and experience in the same type of institution for which the administrator would be hiring the ALD.
机译:图书馆员传统上会依靠大学图书馆馆长(ALD)列出哪些素质使他们擅长于自己的工作。很少有研究寻求机构管理者(谁是聘用ALD的人)对他们在聘用ALD时所寻求的意见。这项研究列出了ALD所评价的质量列表,这些质量对于负责聘用图书馆馆长的机构管理人员来说非常重要。这些招聘管理员被要求对质量进行评分,并将他们认为重要的任何质量添加到列表中。然后将他们的评分方式与图书馆馆长的评分方式进行比较,以了解两组的评分之间的匹配程度。结果表明,两组之间在统计学上具有显着一致性,但也存在重要差异。主要区别在于,招聘管理人员倾向于将意识形态属性(基于职业倾向和理想的属性)放在优先位置,而大学图书馆馆长则将经验视为更重要。招聘管理员还向原始列表添加了一些属性,包括管理多个优先级,以学习/学生为导向(特别是针对低成就者),具有良好的职业道德自我指导,能够有效地与所有选区和经验相关联在与管理员将要聘用ALD的机构类型相同的机构中。

著录项

  • 作者

    Fitsimmons, Gary.;

  • 作者单位

    Texas Woman's University.;

  • 授予单位 Texas Woman's University.;
  • 学科 Library Science.; Education Higher.; Education Administration.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 99 p.
  • 总页数 99
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 图书馆学、图书馆事业;高等教育;教育;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:41:28

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号