首页> 外文学位 >Data mining analysis of the effect of educational, demographic, and economic factors on time from doctoral program entry to degree completion in education.
【24h】

Data mining analysis of the effect of educational, demographic, and economic factors on time from doctoral program entry to degree completion in education.

机译:数据挖掘分析教育,人口统计和经济因素对从博士课程进入到学位学习的时间影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The duration of doctoral studies has been linked to low persistence rates and can therefore be viewed as an indirect measure of risk for non-completion. In 2004, the median time between masters and doctorate in Education was 12.7 years, which was 4 years longer than the median for all fields. The purpose of this study was to identify demographic, educational, and economic factors associated with atypically long time (i.e., the highest 33%) between doctoral program admission and degree completion. The population included all doctoral recipients in Education from Florida public universities between 1998 and 2004 (n=773). Data mining was used to generate six models which were compared on the basis of variable importance and predictive accuracy. Tree and classification models were compared to models developed through the traditional statistical methods of discriminant analysis and logistic regression. Assessment of model predictive accuracy was based on four criteria as follows: cumulative misclassification rate, weighted misclassification rate, misclassification of the dependent variable, and model consistency. The models' predictive accuracy differed but there was general consensus on variable importance with educational and institutional variables superseding all demographic variables. The highest predictive accuracy was observed in the three tree models which validated the analytic merit of data mining in this study.
机译:博士研究的持续时间与低持续性有关,因此可以看作是非完成风险的间接度量。 2004年,教育硕士和博士学位之间的平均时间为12.7年,比所有领域的平均时间长4年。这项研究的目的是确定与从博士课程入学到学位完成之间的非典型时间(即最高的33%)相关的人口,教育和经济因素。人口包括1998年至2004年间佛罗里达州公立大学的所有教育学博士生(n = 773)。数据挖掘被用来生成六个模型,这些模型在变量重要性和预测准确性的基础上进行了比较。将树模型和分类模型与通过判别分析和逻辑回归的传统统计方法开发的模型进行了比较。模型预测准确性的评估基于以下四个标准:累积错误分类率,加权错误分类率,因变量的错误分类以及模型一致性。该模型的预测准确性有所不同,但人们对变量重要性的普遍共识是,教育和体制变量取代了所有人口统计学变量。在三个树模型中观察到最高的预测准确性,这验证了本研究中数据挖掘的分析价值。

著录项

  • 作者

    McLaughlin, Gayle.;

  • 作者单位

    The Florida State University.;

  • 授予单位 The Florida State University.;
  • 学科 Higher education.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 126 p.
  • 总页数 126
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号