首页> 外文学位 >Political parties and direct democracy: An analysis of the 2015 Greek referendum.
【24h】

Political parties and direct democracy: An analysis of the 2015 Greek referendum.

机译:政党与直接民主:2015年希腊公投分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

On July 5, 2015, Greek voters were asked to vote on whether the country should accept the terms of austerity offered by the European Union for bailout from the country's financial crisis. With a turnout rate of 62.5% overall, 61.3% of Greeks voted "no." While a majority of voters in every district opposed the bailout's terms, the margin against the proposed austerity measures ranged from 51.2% in Lakonias to 73.8% in Chanion. This paper explores whether political parties influenced Greek voters' decisions to accept or reject the EU's budgetary reforms. We first review the literature relevant to that question, focusing on whether party platforms are merely "cheap talk" or instead are salient in determining electoral outcomes. We then test our hypotheses empirically at the voting district level. In this model, our key independent variable is party influence, which is measured by party vote shares in the nationwide election held in January of 2015. The dependent variable is the percentage that voted "no" to austerity in July 2015 in each of Greece's 56 electoral districts. We also control for average age and the unemployment rate across regions, as well as the fraction of first-time voters in each electoral district. After conducting simple regression analysis, we report evidence that a pro-austerity party (New Democracy) was a significant factor impacting the results of the referendum. This research finding bolsters the claim that parties can shape electoral outcomes on questions decided by an institution of direct democracy.
机译:2015年7月5日,希腊选民被要求就该国是否应接受欧盟提出的紧缩条款进行投票,以从该国的金融危机中纾困。总体投票率为62.5%,希腊人中有61.3%的人投票反对。尽管每个地区的大多数选民都反对救助计划的条款,但反对拟议的紧缩措施的幅度从拉科尼亚(Lakonias)的51.2%到Chanion的73.8%。本文探讨了政党是否影响了希腊选民接受或拒绝欧盟预算改革的决定。我们首先回顾与该问题相关的文献,重点关注政党平台仅仅是“便宜的谈话”,还是在确定选举结果方面很重要。然后,我们在投票区一级以经验检验我们的假设。在此模型中,我们的关键自变量是政党影响力,它是通过2015年1月举行的全国大选中的政党投票份额来衡量的。因变量是2015年7月在希腊56个国家中对紧缩政策投反对票的百分比选举区。我们还控制了各个地区的平均年龄和失业率,以及每个选举区中首次选民的比例。在进行了简单的回归分析之后,我们报告了支持紧缩政党(新民主主义)是影响公投结果的重要因素的证据。这项研究发现支持这样一种说法,即政党可以根据直接民主制度决定的问题来决定选举结果。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hansen, Megan E.;

  • 作者单位

    Utah State University.;

  • 授予单位 Utah State University.;
  • 学科 Economics.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 35 p.
  • 总页数 35
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号