首页> 外文学位 >The effect of visual, textual, and third-party evaluative cues on impression formation in Facebook.
【24h】

The effect of visual, textual, and third-party evaluative cues on impression formation in Facebook.

机译:视觉,文字和第三方评估线索对Facebook印象形成的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The frequent everyday use of social networking by individuals is a growing factor in today's society. The importance of the specific mechanisms of action individuals take when forming impressions through social networking requires attention from a scientific standpoint. The present research attempted to isolate the specialized cues that social networking sites, such as Facebook, provide to users. Three cues of interest, visual (profile photograph), textual self-disclosure (status updates), and third-party evaluations (comments), as well as past research supporting their connection to impression formation were emphasized. The strength of impressions was measured by participants' perception of a viewed Facebook user's narcissism using an adaptation of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory-16 (NPI-16; Ames, Rose, & Anderson, 2006). I hypothesized that (a) presenting the combination of photographic, textual self-disclosure, and third-party evaluative cues together would yield the highest scores on the NPI-16, and (b) that comments on Facebook (third-party evaluations) presented alone would result in higher scores on the NPI-16 than visual or textual self-disclosure cues presented alone. Participants included 128 male and female Facebook users between the ages of 17 and 48. The effects of Facebook cues on the strength of narcissistic impressions formed by observers were tested using a 2 (visual cue: present vs. absent) x 2 (textual cue: wall post vs. no wall post) x 2 (third-party cue: comment vs. no comment) factorial ANOVA. The ANOVA results indicated that all main effects had significant impacts on participants' perceptions of the target's narcissism; however, third-party cues accounted for the largest percentage of explained variance in NPI-16 scores, supporting hypothesis 2. Third-party evaluations (comments) alone accounted for more variance in narcissistic impressions than either visual (profile photograph) or textual self-disclosure (status update) cues presented individually or in any interactions of the cues. Simple main effects tests indicated partial support for the first research hypothesis. Individuals who viewed a Facebook profile with visual (profile photograph), textual self-disclosure (status update), and third-party evaluative (comments) cues combined formed significantly stronger impressions of an individual than if none of the cues were present. Additional interpretations, limitations of the present study, and directions for future research are discussed.
机译:个人每天频繁使用社交网络是当今社会的一个增长因素。在通过社交网络形成印象时,个人采取特定行动机制的重要性需要从科学的角度进行关注。本研究试图隔离诸如Facebook之类的社交网站提供给用户的专业提示。强调了三个线索,即视觉的(个人资料照片),文本的自我披露(状态更新)和第三方评估(评论),以及支持它们与印象形成相关的以往研究。印象的强度是通过使用自恋人格量表16(NPI-16; Ames,Rose和Anderson,2006)对参与者对所查看的Facebook用户的自恋的感知来衡量的。我假设(a)将图片,文字自我披露和第三方评估线索结合起来,将在NPI-16上获得最高分,(b)在Facebook上发表评论(第三方评估)与单独呈现的视觉或文字自我披露线索相比,单独使用NPI-16会获得更高的分数。参与者包括128位年龄在17至48岁之间的男女Facebook用户。使用2(视觉提示:现在与不存在)x 2(文本提示:)来测试Facebook提示对观察者形成的自恋印象强度的影响。墙贴与无墙贴)x 2(第三方提示:评论与无评论)的阶乘方差分析。方差分析的结果表明,所有主要影响都对参与者对目标自恋的理解产生了重大影响;但是,第三方提示在NPI-16得分中解释的方差中所占的比例最大,支持假设2。第三方评估(评论)在自恋印象中的方方面比视觉(个人资料照片)或文本自我说明的方方面面更大。披露(状态更新)提示,以单个提示或提示的任何交互方式呈现。简单的主效应检验表明对第一个研究假设的部分支持。与视觉提示(个人资料照片),文本自我披露(状态更新)和第三方评估(评论)提示一起查看过Facebook个人资料的人相比,如果没有提示,则对个人的印象要强得多。讨论了本研究的其他解释,局限性以及未来研究的方向。

著录项

  • 作者

    Babineaux, Justin D.;

  • 作者单位

    Lamar University - Beaumont.;

  • 授予单位 Lamar University - Beaumont.;
  • 学科 Psychology Social.;Speech Communication.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 79 p.
  • 总页数 79
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号