首页> 外文学位 >Evaluating the effectiveness of a learning system for technical calculus.
【24h】

Evaluating the effectiveness of a learning system for technical calculus.

机译:评估技术演算学习系统的有效性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Scope and method of study. Scope and method of study. The purpose of this qualitative and quantitative study was to describe the perceptions and experiences of participants that attended discussion sessions and/or used the Technical Calculus Learning Supplement (TCLS). This study also investigated the D-F-W rate, class attendance, and pre and post-algebra assessment scores between the participants and non-participants. Each participant completed a questionnaire over the TCLS, a questionnaire over the discussion sessions, pre/post algebra assessment, and a long interview with the researcher. In addition, the researcher recorded daily hits to each of the TCLS components using website counters.;Findings and conclusion. Students used the learning assessment measures (LAMS) the most out of any of the six components of the TCLS; followed by the how to study mathematics; quick algebra review (QAR); quick trigonometry review (QTR); how to use the TI-83 calculator; and the applications from engineering technology components. Students revealed six different reasons why they used the TCLS website and revealed various reasons why they used each of the six components of the TCLS. Furthermore, participants and non-participants expressed nine different reasons why they did not use the TCLS during the semester. Other participants and non-participants stated three reasons why they used the TCLS in a more limited way.;Participants earn a significantly higher mean course grade than did nonparticipants. For those students that did not withdraw or quit coming to class, participants missed significantly fewer days in class than did non-participants. The results of this research showed that there was no significant difference in the pre-algebra assessment scores for participants and non-participants, nor was there any significant difference in the gain from the pre to post-algebra assessment scores for participants and non-participants.;The students revealed ten reasons why they attended the discussion sessions during the semester. Other students stated seven reasons why they did not attend the discussion sessions. Students attributed much of their success in the course to the three step method that was used in the discussion sessions and stated that the discussion sessions helped them be more actively involved in their own learning. The students stated six different ways in which the discussion sessions helped them in the course.
机译:研究范围和方法。研究范围和方法。这项定性和定量研究的目的是描述参加讨论会和/或使用了技术微积分学习补充(TCLS)的参与者的看法和经验。这项研究还调查了参加者和非参加者之间的D-F-W率,班级出勤率以及代数前后的评估分数。每个参与者都完成了关于TCLS的问卷调查,关于讨论会的问卷调查,代数前后的评估以及对研究人员的长时间采访。此外,研究人员使用网站计数器记录了每个TCLS组件的每日点击量。发现和结论。在TCLS的六个组成部分中,学生最多使用了学习评估措施(LAMS);其次是如何学习数学;快速代数复习(QAR);快速三角学审查(QTR);如何使用TI-83计算器;以及工程技术组件中的应用。学生们揭示了使用TCLS网站的六个不同原因,并揭示了他们使用TCLS的六个组成部分的各种原因。此外,参与者和非参与者表达了他们在学期不使用TCLS的九个不同原因。其他参与者和非参与者指出了他们以更有限的方式使用TCLS的三个原因。参与者的平均课程成绩明显高于非参与者。对于那些没有退学或不上课的学生,与没有参加活动的学生相比,参加者错过的上课天数要少得多。这项研究的结果表明,参与者和非参与者的代数前评估分数没有显着差异,参与者和非参与者的从代数前评估后收益的增幅也没有显着差异。 。;学生们揭示了他们在本学期参加讨论会的十个原因。其他学生陈述了他们不参加讨论会的七个原因。学生将本课程中的成功归功于讨论会议中使用的三步法,并指出讨论会议有助于他们更积极地参与自己的学习。学生们说出了六种不同的方式来帮助他们在课程中进行讨论。

著录项

  • 作者

    Miller, David Allan.;

  • 作者单位

    Oklahoma State University.;

  • 授予单位 Oklahoma State University.;
  • 学科 Education Mathematics.;Education Technology of.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 252 p.
  • 总页数 252
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号