首页> 外文学位 >Guanxi and legitimacy: Understanding corporate social responsibility and public relations in China and the U.S
【24h】

Guanxi and legitimacy: Understanding corporate social responsibility and public relations in China and the U.S

机译:关系和合法性:了解中美两国的企业社会责任和公共关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study provides a cross-cultural comparison of public relations practitioners as the facilitators of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives in China and in the U.S. A qualitative investigation was conducted employing grounded theory and in-depth interviews with 11 participants, incorporating representatives from top U.S. and China public relations firms, including five top ten international public relations firms. The research found that guanxi (business relationships) is a major cultural influence on the institutionalization of CSR in China, whereas legitimacy, and a need to develop more sophisticated business strategy and protect brand image, has driven CSR development at an increased rate in the West. The results build on a theoretical understanding of CSR as having an economic, legal, ethical, and/or discretionary rationale (Carroll, 1979), and call for a new theoretical understanding that focuses more on the benefit of CSR to society and its integration with business strategy. The study validates the role of public relations practitioners as the facilitators of CSR. Finally, the findings indicate that CSR is not paradigmatic by region so much as by business experience. That is, an overarching cross-cultural CSR paradigm emerged in this study that correlated effective CSR programs with levels of experience in running a business in the free-enterprise system. This study revealed a pattern of global activation that starts by uniting an organization around a similar issue or interest, activating stakeholders at the local level and adjusting for community-specific and culturally specific need, and laddering local effects back up to a greater global awareness and impact.
机译:这项研究对作为中国和美国公司社会责任(CSR)倡议推动者的公共关系从业人员进行了跨文化比较。采用扎根理论进行了定性调查,并与11名参与者进行了深入访谈,其中包括来自高层的代表。美国和中国的公共关系公司,包括五家国际十大公共关系公司。研究发现,关系(C关系)是中国企业社会责任制度化的主要文化影响,而合法性以及制定更复杂的业务战略和保护品牌形象的需求推动了西方企业社会责任的发展。结果建立在对CSR具有经济,法律,道德和/或酌处理由的理论理解上(Carroll,1979),并呼吁人们重新思考一个新的理论理解,即更多地关注CSR对社会的利益及其与社会的融合。经营策略。这项研究验证了公共关系从业人员作为企业社会责任推动者的作用。最后,研究结果表明,企业社会责任不是区域范式,而是商业经验。就是说,这项研究中出现了一个总体的跨文化CSR范例,该范例将有效的CSR计划与在自由企业系统中开展业务的经验水平相关联。这项研究揭示了一种全球激活的模式,这种模式首先是围绕一个类似的问题或兴趣组织一个组织,在地方一级激活利益相关者,并针对社区特定和文化特定的需求进行调整,然后将本地影响逐步提升到更高的全球意识和影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Morrow, Sarah Ashton.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Alabama.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Alabama.;
  • 学科 Communication.;Mass communication.;Management.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 100 p.
  • 总页数 100
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:40:46

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号