首页> 外文学位 >Genetic resistance in soybean to Pythium damping-off and molecular characterization of Pythium populations on soybean in Arkansas.
【24h】

Genetic resistance in soybean to Pythium damping-off and molecular characterization of Pythium populations on soybean in Arkansas.

机译:大豆对腐霉菌衰减的遗传抗性和阿肯色州大豆腐霉菌种群的分子特征。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Pythium damping-off and root rot on soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] can cause poor stands and consequently lower yields and is found in all soybean-producing regions of the world. Pythium damping-off and root rot is generally controlled with fungicide seed treatments, but recently the cultivar Archer was reported to be more resistant to seedling diseases caused by Pythium spp. than 'Hutcheson'. In order to determine the inheritance of Pythium resistance in 'Archer', 'Archer' was crossed with 'Hutcheson' and the parents and F2:4 populations were screened in a growth chamber with P. aphanidermatum using a hypocotyl inoculation technique. F 2:4 lines from 'Archer' x 'Hutcheson' fit the model for a single dominant gene in 'Archer' that confers resistance to Pythium damping-off caused by P. aphanidermatum. Resistance to Pythium spp. was not linked to the Rps1k gene that confers resistance to Phytophthora sojae, as previously reported. The Pythium resistance gene was located 10.6 cM from Satt510 and 26.6 cM from Satt114 on the major linkage group F. The new resistance gene was tentatively named Rpa1. However, P. aphanidermatum is one of the seven Pythium species that can attack soybean roots. In order to characterize the diversity of Pythium species associated with soybean roots in Arkansas, field tests were performed at four locations and three different planting dates (mid-April, mid-May and mid-June) in Arkansas from 2002 to 2005. Field isolates were collected from soybean roots. The PCR-RFLP technique of the mitochondrially-encoded cytochrome oxidase II (cox II) gene was used to support morphological identification. Cox II gene is highly conserved within, but not across Pythium species, and thus has the potential for being used in species discrimination. DNA from 683 isolates recovered from soybean roots was amplified using mtDNA cox II gene specific primers for the genus Pythium. Cutting amplicons with three restriction enzymes (Alu I, Rsa I and Nla III) created 28 species-specific restriction fragment length polymorphism banding profiles that aid the accurate identification of isolates to species level. The 683 Pythium isolates belonged to 13 different Pythium species. The most frequent Pythium spp. recovered were Pythium sylvaticum (63%), followed by P. irregulare (13.5%), P. dissotocum (12.8%), P. ultimum var. ultimum (5.9%), P. ultimum var. sporangiiferum (1.4%), P. myriotylum (0.7%), P. torulosum (0.7%), P. oligandrum (0.6%), P. pulchrum (0.3%), P. spinosum (0.3%), P. acanthicum (0.2%), P. rostratum (0.2%), and P. heterothallicum (0.2%). Based on the PCR-RFLP results, for most Pythium species, intraspecific variation in the banding patterns was observed. The phylogenetic relationship of the Pythium spp. was determined by sequence alignment of the cox II gene. The species grouped into four major clades that were in general reflective of the sporangial morphology.;In order to determine the effect of planting date and the performance of soybean cultivars previously assessed as resistant and susceptible to Pythium under controlled environmental conditions, plant stand, yield, root and top weight, root discoloration and Pythium incidence was recorded. Overall results showed that early planting dates (April and May), when soil temperatures tend to be low to moderate, seemed to favor soybean agronomic characteristics, such as yield and plant stand in Arkansas; and later planting dates (June) favor root discoloration and Pythium incidence. These results correlate with the Pythium isolate recovery study, where there was a clear trend in higher Pythium spp, recovery with later planting dates. In general, Pioneer cultivars (94M70 and 94M41) that were assessed as resistant to Pythium spp. under controlled environmental conditions, were resistant to Pythium in regard to root discoloration and Pythium incidence, but not plant stand and yield. Pathogenicity tests of arbitrarily selected Pythium field isolates were performed. Out of 12 Pythium spp. evaluated, seven Pythium species were pathogenic to soybean (58%) (P. aphanidermatum, P. ultimum, P. torulosum, P. myriotylum, P. irregulare, P. sylvaticum and P. dissotocum ). P. aphanidermatum and P. myriotylum were pathogenic and highly aggressive at high temperatures. P. ultimum and P. torulosum were pathogenic and highly aggressive at low temperatures. P. irregulare was pathogenic at moderate temperatures. However, isolates of P. sylvaticum and P. dissotocum were moderate and weakly pathogenic to soybean at low and high temperatures, showing that these species could infect soybean under a wide range of environmental conditions.
机译:大豆上的腐霉腐减和根腐病[Glycine max(L.)Merr。]可能导致歉收并因此降低单产,在世界所有大豆生产地区都可以发现。腐霉病的消灭和根腐病一般通过杀真菌剂种子处理来控制,但是最近有报道称,Archer品种对腐霉菌引起的幼苗病害具有更强的抵抗力。比“哈奇森”。为了确定在“ Archer”中耐腐霉性的遗传,将“ Archer”与“ Hutcheson”杂交,并使用下胚轴接种技术在Aphanidermatum的生长室中筛选亲本和F2:4种群。来自“ Archer” x“ Hutcheson”的F 2:4品系适合“ Archer”中单个显性基因的模型,该基因赋予了对P. aphanidermatum引起的腐霉衰减的抵抗力。对腐霉属的抗性。如先前报道,该基因与赋予大豆疫霉菌抗性的Rps1k基因没有联系。腐霉抗性基因位于主要连锁群F上,距离Satt510为10.6 cM,而距离Satt114为26.6 cM。新的抗性基因暂定为Rpa1。然而,P。aphanidermatum是可以攻击大豆根的七个腐霉属物种之一。为了表征阿肯色州与大豆根相关的腐霉属物种的多样性,从2002年至2005年在阿肯色州的四个地点和三个不同的播种日期(4月中旬,5月中旬和6月中旬)进行了田间试验。从大豆根部收集。线粒体编码的细胞色素氧化酶II(cox II)基因的PCR-RFLP技术用于支持形态学鉴定。 Cox II基因在腐霉属物种中高度保守,但在整个腐霉属物种中并不保守,因此具有用于物种识别的潜力。使用腐霉属的mtDNA cox II基因特异性引物扩增了从大豆根中回收的683个分离株的DNA。用三种限制酶(Alu I,Rsa I和Nla III)切割扩增子可产生28种特定于物种的限制片段长度多态性条带图谱,有助于准确鉴定菌种水平。 683个腐霉分离株属于13个不同的腐霉属。腐霉菌属最常见。回收的是腐霉菌(63%),其次是不规则疟原虫(13.5%),双歧疟原虫(12.8%),最后变种。终极(5.9%),P.ultimum var。孢子管(1.4%),鼠疫假单胞菌(0.7%),疣状假单胞菌(0.7%),寡头假单胞菌(0.6%),羽状假单胞菌(0.3%),刺状假单胞菌(0.3%),棘皮体育( 0.2%),地衣体育(0.2%)和异黄体育(0.2%)。基于PCR-RFLP结果,对于大多数腐霉属物种,观察到条带模式的种内变化。腐霉属的系统发育关系。通过cox II基因的序列比对确定。将该物种分为四个主要进化枝,这些进化枝总体上反映了孢子囊的形态。为了确定播种期的影响和先前评估为在受控环境条件下对腐霉病具有抗性和易感性的大豆品种的性能,植物分立,产量记录根和顶重,根变色和腐霉病发生率。总体结果表明,当土壤温度趋于低至中度时,早期播种日期(4月和5月)似乎有利于大豆的农艺性状,例如阿肯色州的产量和株高。后来的播种日期(6月)有利于根变色和腐霉病的发生。这些结果与腐霉分离物的回收研究相关,腐霉菌属较高的趋势明显,随着播种日期的延长,腐霉菌的恢复也很明显。通常,被评估为对腐霉属具有抗性的先锋品种(94M70和94M41)。在受控的环境条件下,根腐病和腐霉病的发生对腐霉病具有抗性,但对植物的地位和产量却没有抵抗力。进行了任意选择的腐霉属菌株的致病性测试。在12个腐霉属中据评估,腐霉属有7种对大豆有致病性(58%)(P。aphanidermatum,P。ultimum,P。torulosum,P。myriotylum,P。不规则体育,P。sylvaticum和P. dissotocum)。 P. aphanidermatum和P. myriotylum具有致病性,在高温下具有高度侵袭性。终极疟原虫和托鲁氏疟原虫是致病性的,在低温下具有很高的侵袭性。不规则疟原虫在中等温度下致病。然而,在低温和高温条件下,腐烂假单胞菌和假单胞菌的分离株对大豆均具有中等程度的致病性,表明这些物种可以在广泛的环境条件下感染大豆。

著录项

  • 作者

    Rosso, Maria Luciana.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Arkansas.;

  • 授予单位 University of Arkansas.;
  • 学科 Agriculture Agronomy.;Agriculture Plant Pathology.;Biology Molecular.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 313 p.
  • 总页数 313
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号