首页> 外文学位 >Delayed onset muscle soreness in a bench press exercise
【24h】

Delayed onset muscle soreness in a bench press exercise

机译:卧推运动中延迟发作的肌肉酸痛

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) is a common experience, yet the cause of DOMS is poorly understood and the approaches used in research to measure DOMS vary widely. The study objectives were as follows: (1) to explore the contribution of movement strategy, as measured by acceleration, to resulting DOMS; and (2) to perform a systematic comparison (magnitude and time course) of DOMS measures. Methods. Twenty subjects were randomly assigned to use one of two movement strategies (high acceleration (HA) or low acceleration (LA)) in performing forty repetitions of a submaximal (75% concentric 1 RM) bench press. Acceleration of one upper extremity was measured to derive "drop and catch" acceleration magnitudes and high frequency acceleration magnitudes. Pain was evaluated on a series of 10 cm VAS' pre- and immediately post-exercise and at 12 hour intervals to 48 hours. Subjects' responses were measured at rest (R), with two levels of stretch (S1 and S2), and two levels of mechanical pressure (350 kPa with P1 and 139 kPa with P2). Effect of pain on function was also subjectively rated (Func). Results. Maximum and time-specific DOMS magnitude measured by R was significantly lower than all other pain measures (p<0.05). Significant differences were found between S1 and S2 (p<0.05) but not P1 and P2. Acceleration based movement parameters, especially high frequency acceleration, were found to be significant predictors of pain (p<0.05). No significance was found using physical parameters or exercise parameters. Conclusions. DOMS magnitude and time course varies depending on the measure used and selection of measures should be done with careful consideration. Acceleration parameters are predictive of DOMS magnitude reflecting that within exercise shifts in neuromuscular activation strategy is a contributing factor.
机译:迟发性肌肉酸痛(DOMS)是一种常见的经验,但是对DOMS的原因了解甚少,并且用于测量DOMS的研究方法也相差很大。研究目标如下:(1)探索以加速度衡量的运动策略对最终DOMS的贡献; (2)对DOMS措施进行系统的比较(幅度和时间过程)。方法。随机分配20名受试者使用两种运动策略(高加速度(HA)或低加速度(LA))之一执行次最大(75%同心1 RM)卧推的四十次重复。测量一个上肢的加速度,以得出“跌落”加速度幅度和高频加速度幅度。在运动前和运动后的一系列10 cm VAS'上评估疼痛,​​间隔为12小时至48小时。受试者的反应在静止(R)时进行测量,包括两个拉伸水平(S1和S2)和两个机械压力水平(P1为350 kPa,P2为139 kPa)。疼痛对功能的影响也被主观评估(Func)。结果。通过R测量的最大和特定时间的DOMS幅度显着低于所有其他疼痛度量(p <0.05)。在S1和S2之间发现了显着差异(p <0.05),但在P1和P2之间没有显着差异。发现基于加速度的运动参数,尤其是高频加速度,是疼痛的重要预测指标(p <0.05)。使用身体参数或运动参数未发现显着性。结论。 DOMS的大小和时间过程会根据所使用的度量而有所不同,在选择度量时应仔细考虑。加速度参数可预测DOMS的大小,反映出神经肌肉激活策略在运动中的变化是一个重要因素。

著录项

  • 作者

    McRae, Sheila M.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Manitoba (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Manitoba (Canada).;
  • 学科 Physiology.;Kinesiology.
  • 学位 M.Sc.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 93 p.
  • 总页数 93
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号