首页> 外文学位 >Influenza and secondary bacterial pneumonia: Modulation of the host anti-viral immune response and the interferon paradox.
【24h】

Influenza and secondary bacterial pneumonia: Modulation of the host anti-viral immune response and the interferon paradox.

机译:流感和继发性细菌性肺炎:调节宿主抗病毒免疫反应和干扰素悖论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In 1918 the influenza virus (flu), in terms of total fatalities, was responsible for the worst pandemic the world has ever seen. The major cause of death is now attributed to secondary bacterial pneumonia. Flu infection itself was not the major cause of death. The most common pathogen responsible for fatality post-flu is believed to be Streptococcus pneumoniae, and this is the still the case regarding the recent 2009 pandemic H1N1 strain of "swine flu". Secondary bacterial pneumonias continue be the most common cause of death resulting from influenza, even after the advent of antibiotics, and the most common pathogen that is responsible for this continues to be Streptococcus pneumoniae. This is especially true in regard to the young and healthy members of society that do not have any co-morbid conditions during pandemic influenza outbreaks unlike the very old and young that are typically the victims following seasonal flu.;Type I interferons (IFN) are essential to minimize viral infection. These innate cytokines have numerous beneficial functions. However, influenza has developed multiple mechanisms that perturb the host interferon response, altering the levels, and timing, of the expression of these cytokines that thereby render them potentially detrimental to the host. The major hypothesis of this work focuses on the relative beneficial and/or detrimental role that type I IFN may have in the context of host immunity. We hypothesize that type I IFN has evolved to be beneficial, yet flu virulence factors perturb the ability of type I IFN to act in a beneficial role post-flu and instead augments the risk of SBP. Volatile anesthetics appear to ameliorate this.;In agreement with our hypothesis and past experimental findings, we found that 1) Halothane effectively mitigated the risk of secondary bacterial pneumonia post-flu. 2) This was dependent upon mitigation of the effects of type I IFN by halothane. 3) Using nanoparticle based therapeutics, restoration of type I IFN at an early, appropriate time point following flu infection has the potential to minimize influenza burden, and potentially inhibit risk of pneumococcal secondary pneumonia.;The findings from these studies have immediate clinical pertinence. Given that patients presenting with symptoms of upper respiratory tract infections may not be at increased risk of pulmonary complications if anesthetized with volatile anesthetics. Additionally, this work identifies novel mechanisms through which flu, its sequelae, and potentially other viral infections, may be thwarted through novel host immune-modulatory mechanisms.
机译:就总死亡人数而言,1918年的流感病毒是造成全球有史以来最严重的大流行的原因。现在,死亡的主要原因是继发性细菌性肺炎。流感感染本身并不是主要的死亡原因。据信,造成流感后死亡的最常见病原体是肺炎链球菌,对于最近发生的2009年“猪流感”大流行H1N1毒株,情况仍然如此。即使在抗生素出现之后,继发性细菌性肺炎仍然是由流感引起的最常见死亡原因,造成这种情况的最常见病原体仍是肺炎链球菌。对于大流行性流感爆发期间没有任何合并症的年轻人和健康的社会成员而言,尤其如此,这与通常在季节性流感后成为受害者的非常老幼的年轻人不同; I型干扰素(IFN)是对减少病毒感染至关重要。这些先天的细胞因子具有许多有益的功能。然而,流行性感冒已经发展出多种机制,干扰了宿主干扰素的反应,改变了这些细胞因子的表达水平和时间,从而使它们潜在地对宿主有害。这项工作的主要假设集中于I型干扰素在宿主免疫中可能具有的相对有益和/或有害作用。我们假设I型干扰素已发展为有益的,但流感毒力因子会干扰I型干扰素在流感后发挥有益作用的能力,反而会增加SBP的风险。挥发性麻醉药似乎可以改善这种情况。与我们的假设和过去的实验结果相符,我们发现1)氟烷有效地减轻了流感后继发性细菌性肺炎的风险。 2)这取决于氟烷减轻I型干扰素的作用。 3)使用基于纳米颗粒的疗法,在流感感染后的早期,适当的时间点恢复I型干扰素有可能将流感负担降至最低,并可能抑制肺炎球菌继发性肺炎的风险。这些研究的发现具有直接的临床意义。假设出现上呼吸道感染症状的患者,如果使用挥发性麻醉药麻醉,可能不会增加发生肺部并发症的风险。此外,这项工作确定了新颖的机制,可以通过新颖的宿主免疫调节机制阻止流感,其后遗症和其他潜在的病毒感染。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    State University of New York at Buffalo.;

  • 授予单位 State University of New York at Buffalo.;
  • 学科 Immunology.;Microbiology.;Medicine.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 224 p.
  • 总页数 224
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号