首页> 外文学位 >The antecedents and consequences of the variability in job satisfaction.
【24h】

The antecedents and consequences of the variability in job satisfaction.

机译:工作满意度变化的前因和后果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Given the recent increase in the investigation of the intraindividual variability of job satisfaction (e.g., Ilies & Judge, 2002) the present study sought to further our understanding of this topic through more comprehensively investigating the potential predictors and criteria of the frequency and amplitude with which individuals vary in their levels of job satisfaction over short time frames. It was hoped that by including both personality (i.e., NA, PA, Neuroticism, Extraversion, and Openness to Experience) and situational predictors (i.e. job stressors), results from this study would help clarify how individual differences interact with situational characteristics to explain patterns of within-person variability. In addition, this study also sought to determine the extent to which job satisfaction variability is important to the prediction of employee job performance and turnover intentions. Results from the current study suggest that it may not be useful to distinguish between the frequency and amplitude with which individuals vary in their levels of job satisfaction over short time frames. Aside from this general conclusion, the situational predictor and three of the five personality traits investigated were shown to be important in explaining the frequency with which individuals' coworker, nature of work and promotion satisfaction varied. Variation in the facet of work satisfaction was also found to be an important predictor of job performance, and this remained true after accounting for mean levels of work satisfaction measured cross-sectionally. Finally, results lend some support to suggest the facets of coworker and nature of work satisfaction to be particularly important when considering short-term within-person variation. While many of the hypothesized relationships were not supported, given the current results, it seems worthwhile to continue to investigate the roles that personality and situational change play in describing the within-person variation of different facets of job satisfaction as well as the role of this within-person variation in predicting organizational outcomes.
机译:鉴于最近对工作满意度的个人差异调查的增加(例如,Ilies&Judge,2002年),本研究旨在通过更全面地调查潜在的预测因素以及频率和振幅的标准来增进我们对这一主题的理解。个人在短时间内的工作满意度水平会有所不同。希望通过同时包括人格(即NA,PA,神经质,外向性和开放经验)和情境预测因素(即工作压力因素),这项研究的结果将有助于阐明个体差异如何与情境特征相互作用以解释模式内变异性。此外,本研究还试图确定工作满意度变异性对预测员工工作绩效和离职意图的重要程度。当前研究的结果表明,在短期内区分个人工作满意度水平变化的频率和幅度可能没有用。除了这个一般性结论外,情境预测因素和所调查的五个人格特质中的三个在说明个人同事的频率,工作性质和晋升满意度变化方面也很重要。工作满意度方面的变化也被认为是工作绩效的重要预测指标,在考虑了横截面测量的平均工作满意度水平之后,情况仍然如此。最后,研究结果为同事的各个方面和工作满意度的本质提供了一些支持,这在考虑短期人际差异时尤为重要。尽管不支持许多假设的关系,但根据当前的结果,似乎有必要继续研究人格和情境变化在描述工作满意度不同方面的人际变化中所起的作用以及这种作用。人际变化在预测组织成果方面。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kotrba, Lindsey M.;

  • 作者单位

    Wayne State University.$bPsychology.;

  • 授予单位 Wayne State University.$bPsychology.;
  • 学科 Psychology Industrial.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 124 p.
  • 总页数 124
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 工业心理学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号