首页> 外文学位 >On the importance of commodity and energy price shocks for the macroeconomy.
【24h】

On the importance of commodity and energy price shocks for the macroeconomy.

机译:关于商品和能源价格冲击对宏观经济的重要性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Although higher commodity prices are commonly thought to presage higher rates of inflation, the existing literature suggests that the predictive power of commodity prices for inflation has waned since the 1980s. In the first chapter, I show that this result can be overturned using state-of-the-art forecast combination methods. Moreover, commodity prices are shown to contain predictive information not contained in the leading principal components of a broad set of macroeconomic and financial variables. These improved inflation forecasts are of little value, however, for predicting actual Fed policy decisions.;The remaining two chapters study the effect of energy price shocks on U.S. consumer and business expenditures. In the second chapter, I show that there is no statistical support for the presence of asymmetries in the response of real consumption to energy price increases and decreases. This finding has important implications for empirical and theoretical models of the transmission of energy price shocks. I then quantify the direct effect on real consumption of (1) unanticipated changes in discretionary income, (2) shifts in precautionary savings, and (3) changes in the operating cost of energy-using durables. Finally, I trace the declining importance of energy price shocks relative to the 1970s to changes in the composition of U.S. automobile production and the declining overall importance of the U.S. automobile sector.;An alternative source of asymmetry is the response of nonresidential fixed investment to energy price shocks. In the third chapter, I show that the apparent asymmetry in the estimated responses of business fixed investment in equipment and structures is largely an artifact (1) of the aggregation of mining-related expenditures by the oil, natural gas, and coal mining industry and all other expenditures, and (2) of ignoring an exogenous shift in investment caused by the 1986 Tax Reform Act. Once symmetry is imposed and miningrelated expenditures are excluded, the estimated response of business fixed investment in equipment and structures tends to be small and mostly statistically insignificant. Historical decompositions show that energy price shocks have played a minor role in driving fluctuations in nonresidential fixed investment other than investment in mining.
机译:尽管通常认为较高的商品价格预示着较高的通货膨胀率,但现有文献表明,自1980年代以来,商品价格对通货膨胀的预测能力已经减弱。在第一章中,我展示了使用最新的预测组合方法可以推翻该结果。此外,商品价格已显示出包含在广泛的宏观经济和金融变量的主要主要组成部分中的预测信息。但是,这些改进的通胀预测对预测美联储的实际决策没有什么价值。;其余两章研究了能源价格冲击对美国消费者和企业支出的影响。在第二章中,我表明,在实际消费对能源价格上涨和下跌的反应中,不对称性的存在没有统计支持。这一发现对能源价格冲击传导的经验和理论模型具有重要意义。然后,我将量化对(1)可支配收入的意外变化,(2)预防性储蓄的变化以及(3)耗能耐用品的运营成本变化对实际消费的直接影响。最后,我追溯了相对于1970年代,能源价格冲击对美国汽车生产构成变化的重要性下降以及美国汽车行业总体重要性的下降。;非对称性的另一种来源是非住宅固定投资对能源的反应价格震荡。在第三章中,我表明,在设备和构筑物上的商业固定投资的估计响应中,明显的不对称性主要是石油,天然气和煤炭开采行业与采矿相关的支出合计的人为因素(1),以及所有其他支出,以及(2)忽略了1986年《税制改革法案》引起的投资外生转移。一旦实行了对称性并排除了与采矿有关的支出,对设备和构筑物的商业固定投资的估计响应就趋向于很小,并且在统计上几乎没有意义。历史分解表明,能源价格冲击在推动非居民固定投资(采矿投资除外)波动中起了很小的作用。

著录项

  • 作者

    Edelstein, Paul S.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Michigan.;

  • 授予单位 University of Michigan.;
  • 学科 Economics General.;Energy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 205 p.
  • 总页数 205
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号