首页> 外文学位 >Evaluation of prefermentation as a unit process upon biological nutrient removal including biokinetic and wastewater parameters.
【24h】

Evaluation of prefermentation as a unit process upon biological nutrient removal including biokinetic and wastewater parameters.

机译:作为去除生物营养物(包括生物动力学参数和废水参数)的一个单元过程的偏爱评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The objective of this dissertation was to provide a controlled comparison of identical continuous flow BNR processes both with and without prefermentation in order to provide a stronger, more quantitative, technical basis for design engineers to evaluate the potential benefits of prefermentation to EBPR in treating domestic wastewater. In addition, the even less understood effect of prefermentation on denitrification kinetics and anoxic phosphorus (P) uptake was studied and quantified. Other aspects of BNR performance, which might change due to use of prefermentation, will also be addressed, including anaerobic stabilization. Potential benefits to BNR processes derived from prefermentation are compared and contrasted with the more well-known benefits of primary clarification. Finally, some biokinetic parameters necessary to successfully model both the activated sludge systems and the prefermenter were determined and compared for the prefermented versus the non-prefermented system.; Important findings developed during the course of this dissertation regarding the impact of prefermentation upon the performance of activated sludge treatment systems are summarized below: (1) For a septic COD-limited (TCOD:TP 40:1) wastewater, prefermentation was found to enhance EPBR by 27.7% at a statistical significance level of alpha=0.05 (95% confidence level). (2) For septic P-limited (TCOD:TP > 40:1) wastewaters, prefermentation was not found to improve EBPR at a statistical significance level of alpha=0.05 (95% confidence level). (3) The increased anaerobic P release and aerobic P uptakes due to prefermentation correlated with greater PHA formation and glycogen consumption during anaerobiosis of prefermented influent. (4) Improvements in biological P removal of septic, non-P limited wastewater occurred even when all additional VFA production exceeded VFA requirements using typical design criteria (e.g. 6 g VFA per 1 g P removal). (5) Prefermentation increased RBCOD content by an average of 28.8% and VFA content by an average of 18.8%, even for a septic domestic wastewater. (6) Prefermentation increased specific anoxic denitrification rates for both COD-limited (14.6%) and P-limited (5.4%) influent wastewaters. This increase was statistically significant at alpha=0.05 for COD-limited wastewater, but not for P-limited wastewater.
机译:本文的目的是对有或没有优先选择的相同连续流BNR工艺进行可控比较,以便为设计工程师提供更强大,更定量的技术基础,以评估优先选择EBPR处理生活废水的潜在利益。 。另外,研究和定量了优选对反硝化动力学和缺氧磷(P)吸收的影响。 BNR性能的其他方面(可能由于使用偏爱而可能发生变化)也将得到解决,包括厌氧稳定性。比较了从优先选择中获得的BNR工艺的潜在好处,并将其与初级澄清的更广为人知的好处进行了对比。最后,确定了成功地对活性污泥系统和偏爱剂进行建模所需的一些生物动力学参数,并对偏爱与不偏爱系统进行了比较。在本论文的过程中,关于优先选择对活性污泥处理系统性能的影响的重要发现总结如下:(1)对于化粪池中COD限量的(TCOD:TP <40:1)废水,优先选择了在统计显著水平为alpha = 0.05(95%置信度)时,将EPBR提升27.7%。 (2)对于化脓性磷限量(TCOD:TP> 40:1)废水,未发现偏爱可改善EBPR,统计学显着性水平为alpha = 0.05(置信度为95%)。 (3)偏爱引起的厌氧P释放增加和需氧P吸收与偏爱进水厌氧期间更大的PHA形成和糖原消耗有关。 (4)即使使用常规设计标准(例如每1 g P去除6 g VFA),所有额外的VFA生产都超过了VFA要求,也可以改善化脓性,非P受限废水的生物P去除。 (5)即使是化粪池生活污水,优选也可将RBCOD含量平均提高28.8%,将VFA含量平均提高18.8%。 (6)对于COD受限(14.6%)和P受限(5.4%)的进水废水,优选增加了特定的缺氧反硝化率。对于COD限制的废水,这种增加具有统计学意义,当alpha = 0.05时,但对于P限制的废水则没有。

著录项

  • 作者

    McCue, Terrence M.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Central Florida.;

  • 授予单位 University of Central Florida.;
  • 学科 Engineering Environmental.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 227 p.
  • 总页数 227
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 环境污染及其防治;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:39:41

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号