首页> 外文学位 >Constructing the moral landscape through antidiscrimination law: Discourse, debate, and dialogue of sexual citizenship in three Florida communities.
【24h】

Constructing the moral landscape through antidiscrimination law: Discourse, debate, and dialogue of sexual citizenship in three Florida communities.

机译:通过反歧视法构建道德环境:佛罗里达州三个社区的性公民讨论,辩论和对话。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This research examines the geographical manifestations of the debates in 2002 over adding sexual orientation antidiscrimination protections within three Florida communities: Miami-Dade County, the City of Orlando, and Collier County. These debates are analyzed within the context of a spatialization of social rights as they take place through community dialogue of the local 'moral landscape'. The overall theoretical dimensions implicated within the spatial diffusion of civil rights protections for sexual minorities are: the spaces of citizenship, community designs on the local political economy, and how the 'culture wars' and local politics coalesce and converge around embodied identity and geographies of inclusion or exclusion. These theoretical designs are approached from two basic scalar aspects: phenomena internal to the individual, and how their particular belief system shapes their geographical imaginations of their community; and culture as a structure of social relations that are writ large through local institutions and regimes. Culture war issues such as gay and lesbian civil rights constitute a distinctive arena of local governance, apart from urban politics as usual. In addition, organizations and individuals that serve as gatekeepers for 'community values' become a key resource in comprehending how morality politics and identity are embedded within notions of the politics of place. While keeping this framework in mind, the debate on anti-discrimination policy that includes sexual orientation was arguably the same for all three places: explosive and divisive. But in other ways, the geographical contingencies of each place exhibit some important and unique differences which greatly impacted the nature of the community debate, as well as the ultimate outcome in passing or rejecting these ordinances.
机译:这项研究调查了2002年关于在佛罗里达州三个社区(迈阿密-戴德县,奥兰多市和科利尔县)中添加性取向反歧视保护措施的辩论的地理表现。这些辩论是在通过当地“道德风光”的社区对话进行的社会权利空间化的背景下进行分析的。性少数群体的民权保护在空间上的扩散所涉及的总体理论维度是:公民身份的空间,当地政治经济上的社区设计以及“文化大战”和地方政治如何凝聚并融合于具体的身份和地理范围内包含或排除。这些理论设计是从两个基本的标量方面出发的:个人内部的现象,以及他们特定的信仰体系如何塑造他们对社区的地理想象力;文化是社会关系的一种结构,通过地方机构和政权而形成。除了通常的城市政治之外,诸如男女同性恋民权之类的文化战争问题构成了地方治理的独特舞台。此外,充当“社区价值”守门人的组织和个人成为理解道德政治和身份如何嵌入地方政治概念的关键资源。在牢记这一框架的同时,关于包括性取向在内的反歧视政策的辩论在三个地方都可以说是相同的:爆炸性和分裂性。但是以其他方式,每个地方的地理突发事件都表现出一些重要而独特的差异,这极大地影响了社区辩论的性质,以及通过或拒绝这些条例的最终结果。

著录项

  • 作者

    Chapman, Thomas E.;

  • 作者单位

    The Florida State University.;

  • 授予单位 The Florida State University.;
  • 学科 Geography.;Gender studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 226 p.
  • 总页数 226
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号