首页> 外文学位 >The political origins of social science: The cultural transformation of the British Parliament and the emergence of scientific policymaking, 1803--1857.
【24h】

The political origins of social science: The cultural transformation of the British Parliament and the emergence of scientific policymaking, 1803--1857.

机译:社会科学的政治渊源:英国议会的文化转型和科学政策制定的出现,1803--1857年。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study is concerned with explaining why and how---under what practical condition and within what social arrangements---knowledge about society emerged as "social science": a relatively autonomous domain of expertise with its own distinctive arrangement of working practices, institutional arrangements and technologies. Social Science, I argue, originated not as much with Marx and Weber in Germany, or Comte and Durkheim in France, as with the political institution of governmental investigations in Britain almost half a century before it obtained academic prestige within the disciplinary framework of the universities. Only after social science was well entrenched in the political field, through the work of governmental commissions, and its influence and effects were felt in the public sphere, through legislation and policy, did it migrate into the universities, where it was appropriated by academics in their associations.; I suggest that there is much we can learn about the scientificity of social knowledge once we forgo the traditional ways in which the history of social science is told and look at political institutions, political practices and political circumstances as the driving force behind the emergence not only of social investigations but indeed of social science more in general. It was politics, its discourse, its mechanics of parliamentary and governmental work, its legislative practices and bureaucratic routines, its technologies of recording, compiling, archiving, presenting and transporting information, which provided the condition of possibility for the emergence of social science as a domain of expertise, not least by investing social knowledge with importance, authority and relevance, through the work of governmental social investigations.; Social science, I argue, was developed as a creative response to the growing requirement of publicity in the exercise of political authority during the first half of the nineteenth century. I locate the origins of social science within a larger transformation in the organizational culture of the British parliament, which took place at this period, following the increasing publicity of parliamentary debates and proceedings in the national Press. This transformation conditioned specific patterns of investigation and publication that turned social knowledge into a domain of expertise, thus paving the way for the emergence of social science. The first step in this transformation was the disenchantment of politics. With the opening of parliament to the "public gaze," politics became a domain an application for public reportage---a category of knowledge, that was understood to be worthwhile to observe and interpret, and which was constituted through the monitoring of parliamentary debates. Once politics was constructed as a field of application for the Press and identified with public reportage, contemporary political and social events inside and outside parliament became observational and 'experimental' and could now be legitimately monitored, accumulated, archived, combined into chronologies, and then served as a basis for interpretation and commentary.; In the second step, the growing coverage of politics in the press, encouraged government officials to take control of the legislation process from parliament by establishing a new policymaking regime, based on empirical explorations of social problems outside parliament by especially assigned governmental commissions. Serving on these commissions, politicians effectively became social experts, turning their gaze onto the public, carefully inspecting and monitoring social problems in their localities, thus making social knowledge a legitimate domain of political expertise. With the growing use of governmental investigations, expert knowledge about society was effectively entrenched into the political field, transforming the organizational culture of parliament, its discourse and practices, from "verbal economy" of oratorical
机译:这项研究的目的是解释为什么以及如何-在什么实际条件下以及在什么社会安排下-关于社会的知识以“社会科学”的形式出现:相对自治的专业知识领域,具有自己独特的工作实践,制度安排安排和技术。我认为,社会科学的起源不像德国的马克思和韦伯,法国的孔德和杜克海姆,而是源于英国政府调查的政治机构近半个世纪之前,它在大学的学科框架内获得了学术上的威望。 。只有通过政府委员会的工作,社会科学在政治领域已根深蒂固,并通过立法和政策在社会领域感受到了社会科学的影响和效果,才将其迁移到大学,并由学术界在此加以应用。他们的协会。我建议,一旦我们放弃了讲社会科学历史的传统方式,而是将政治制度,政治实践和政治环境看作是其背后的推动力量,那么我们就可以学到很多有关社会知识的科学知识。社会调查的范围,但实际上社会科学的范围更广。它是政治,其话语,其议会和政府工作的手段,其立法实践和官僚作风,其记录,编辑,存档,展示和传输信息的技术,这为社会科学作为一种新兴技术提供了条件。专门知识领域,尤其是通过政府社会调查工作,投资具有重要性,权威性和相关性的社会知识。我认为,社会科学的发展是对十九世纪上半叶行使政治权威时不断增长的宣传要求的创造性反应。在国民议会对议会辩论和议事程序的日益宣传之后,我发现社会科学的起源是在这一时期英国议会的组织文化发生较大变化的情况下发生的。这种转变以特定的调查和出版模式为条件,这些模式将社会知识变成了专业知识领域,从而为社会科学的出现铺平了道路。这种转变的第一步是政治的瓦解。随着议会对“公众注视”的开放,政治成为了公共报告领域的应用,这是一种知识类别,被认为值得观察和解释,并且是通过监视议会辩论而构成的。 。一旦政治成为新闻界的应用领域,并得到公共报道的认可,议会内部和外部的当代政治和社会事件就成为观察性的和“实验性的”,现在可以被合法地监视,累积,存档,编入年表,然后作为解释和评论的基础。第二步,新闻界对政治的日益报道,鼓励政府官员根据特别分配的政府委员会对议会之外社会问题的实证研究,通过建立新的决策制度来控制议会的立法程序。在这些委员会任职期间,政客有效地成为了社会专家,将视线转向公众,认真检查和监视了当地的社会问题,从而使社会知识成为政治专长的合法领域。随着政府调查的日益广泛使用,有关社会的专家知识已有效地根植于政治领域,从演讲的“语言经济”转变了议会的组织文化,其话语和做法。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gabay, Nadav.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, San Diego.$bSociology.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, San Diego.$bSociology.;
  • 学科 History European.; History of Science.; Political Science Public Administration.; Sociology General.; Mass Communications.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 487 p.
  • 总页数 487
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 欧洲史;自然科学史;政治理论;社会学;传播理论;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:39:14

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号