首页> 外文学位 >Biomechanical analysis of eccentric and concentric lifting exertions.
【24h】

Biomechanical analysis of eccentric and concentric lifting exertions.

机译:偏心和同心举重运动的生物力学分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Electromyographic (EMG)-assisted biomechanical models have been used to predict spinal reactions forces and evaluate risk of low back disorders (LBDs). One of the challenges facing previous EMG-assisted biomechanical models is that they rely heavily on the active muscle force component. In certain kinds of exertions (eccentric exertions and exertions at or near the full flexion trunk postures) the passive components of the extensor mechanism play a significant role in the net extensor moment, and these are not captured in the traditional EMG-assisted modeling technique.; This study introduces a new EMG assisted biomechanical model that includes passive components. Empirical experiments were conducted to evaluate the improvements in model predictions when these passive tissue components were considered. Eighteen subjects participated in two groups of experiments. In experiment one, subjects performed repetitive, eccentric and concentric lifting motions in a controlled dynamometer task environment. In experiment two, subjects performed a repetitive, free dynamic lifting and lowering exertions. In both experiments, the subjects were asked to reach their full trunk flexion posture during the lifting motion. As they performed these tasks, the EMG activity of the major trunk muscles was collected. The passive tissue forces were estimated through the use of a finite element model of the lumbar region. Estimates of the net internal moment from two different EMG-assisted models (with and without passive components) were compared with the measured net external moment to provide insight into the utility of the inclusion of these passive tissue forces.; The results indicated the necessity of involving passive components in the EMG-assisted biomechanical model when studying the trunk flexion/extension exertions at full trunk flexion postures. The mean absolute error between the measured moment and model predicted moment was significantly smaller for the model with passive components as compared to the model without passive components (19.6 Nm vs. 25.5 Nm in experiment one, and 19.4 Nm vs. 54.9 Nm in experiment two, respectively). The R squared value of the measured and predicted load demonstrated great improvements by involving passive components (37% to 66% in experiment one, 12% to 75% in experiment two, respectively).; In a second phase of this research, this new EMG-assisted model was used to study the differences in the biomechanical response between lowering (eccentric) and lifting (concentric) exertions. Eccentric exertions induced significantly (p0.05) higher mean maximum spine compression forces in both experiments as compared to concentric exertions (3680N vs. 3114N in experiment one, and 2516N vs. 1870N in experiment two, respectively). The variability of the spinal load in these two types of exertions was also compared in terms of the average absolute deviation from the median (AADM) of the compression values (where the median refers to the median values of the multiple repetitions of the same task). This AADM of the maximum compression force was 281N for concentric versus 472N for eccentric exertions in experiment one, and 134N for concentric versus 207N for eccentric exertions in experiment two. These differences were shown to be affected by the lifting/lowering velocity, knee posture and load levels. This result has significant meaning when considering the relative risk of lifting and lowering exertions in the workplace.; This study demonstrated an innovative method to quantitatively include the effects of the passive components of the spine into the EMG-assisted biomechanical model and showed the importance of involving these passive components in the estimation of the spinal load at the full flexed posture and eccentric exertions. The results of this study have also provided some insight into the relative risk of eccentric vs. concentric exertions by understanding the trade-offs between the active and passive tissues o
机译:肌电图(EMG)辅助的生物力学模型已用于预测脊柱反应力并评估下背部疾病(LBD)的风险。以前的EMG辅助生物力学模型面临的挑战之一是它们严重依赖于主动的肌肉力量分量。在某些类型的运动(偏心运动和全屈躯干姿势或接近全屈姿势)下,伸肌机构的被动组件在净伸肌力矩中起着重要作用,而在传统的EMG辅助建模技术中则没有捕捉到这些。 ;这项研究介绍了一种新的EMG辅助的生物力学模型,其中包括无源组件。当考虑了这些被动组织成分时,进行了经验实验以评估模型预测的改进。 18名受试者参加了两组实验。在实验一中,受试者在受控的测功机任务环境中进行了重复,偏心和同心举升运动。在实验二中,受试者进行了重复,自由的动态举起和降低运动。在两个实验中,要求受试者在举起运动期间达到他们的全部躯干屈曲姿势。他们执行这些任务时,收集了主要躯干肌的EMG活动。通过使用腰椎区域的有限元模型来估计被动组织力。将来自两个不同的EMG辅助模型(带有和不带有被动组件)的净内部力矩估计值与测得的净外部力矩进行比较,以了解包括这些被动组织力的效用。结果表明,在研究全躯干屈曲姿势下的躯干屈伸运动时,必须在EMG辅助的生物力学模型中包含被动成分。与无源组件的模型相比,有无源组件的模型的测量力矩与模型预测力矩之间的平均绝对误差要小得多(实验一为19.6 Nm对25.5 Nm,实验二为19.4 Nm对54.9 Nm。 , 分别)。通过使用无源组件,实测负载和预测负载的R平方值显示出了很大的改进(实验一,分别为37%至66%,实验二,分别为12%至75%)。在这项研究的第二阶段,这种新的EMG辅助模型用于研究降低(偏心)运动和提升(同心)运动之间的生物力学响应差异。与同心运动相比,在两个实验中,偏心运动均引起较高的平均最大脊柱压缩力(p <0.05)(实验1中分别为3680N对3114N,实验2中分别为2516N对1870N)。还根据相对于压缩值中位数(AADM)的平均绝对偏差(其中中位数是指同一任务多次重复的中位数)的平均绝对偏差来比较这两种类型的运动中脊柱负荷的变异性。 。在实验一中,同心圆的最大压缩力的AADM为281N,而对于偏心功,最大压缩力的AAN为472N,在实验二中,同心圆的最大压缩力为207N,对于207N。这些差异被显示为受提升/降低速度,膝盖姿势和负荷水平的影响。当考虑在工作场所提升和降低体力劳动的相对风险时,这一结果具有重要意义。这项研究证明了一种创新的方法,可以将脊柱被动成分的影响定量地纳入EMG辅助的生物力学模型中,并显示了在完全弯曲的姿势和偏心运动时,将这些被动成分纳入估算脊柱负荷的重要性。这项研究的结果还通过了解主动和被动组织之间的权衡取舍,提供了一些关于偏心和同心运动的相对风险的见解。

著录项

  • 作者

    Shu, Yu.;

  • 作者单位

    North Carolina State University.;

  • 授予单位 North Carolina State University.;
  • 学科 Engineering Biomedical.; Engineering Industrial.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 177 p.
  • 总页数 177
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 生物医学工程;一般工业技术;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号