首页> 外文学位 >Unit-based municipal solid waste management policies: Drivers and barriers in Massachusetts.
【24h】

Unit-based municipal solid waste management policies: Drivers and barriers in Massachusetts.

机译:基于单位的城市固体废物管理政策:马萨诸塞州的驱动因素和障碍。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The objective of this study is to understand the drivers and barriers in implementing unit-based solid waste management programs and policies in Massachusetts. The primary question is 'why don't more communities implement unit-based systems in their solid waste management programs' when one third of the municipalities in the state already do so, and significant support and resources for unit-based systems are provided by the state's environmental protection agency. A subset of issues such as policy impacts on low-income individuals and households; effects on illegal dumping, solid waste disposal volumes and recycling rates; and communities' views of successes and failures of programs already in place, is included in the analysis. Recycling rates of towns with and without programs, as well as rates before and after implementation are examined; spatial analysis of current and previous landfill and incinerator proximities to towns with and without programs; and individual case studies for towns with and without programs are presented. Results of the demographic analyses showed only total population has a positive effect on unit-based pricing policies enacted at the municipal level. Towns with unit-based programs on average have a 12% higher recycling rate and recycling rates are related to unit-based pricing policies enacted at the municipal level. Communities also see on average a 9% increase in recycling rate immediately following program implementation. Case study analyses found some of the following barriers to policy implementation: no political will, disconnect between residents and community leaders, administrative constraints, resistance or lack of interest from residents, lack of proper supporting programs, and concerns about effects on low-income and elderly populations. In addition to finding various tactics for implementing successful programs, the analyses also found the main drivers for policy implementation was a current or upcoming change in disposal waste fees and lack of funding for other essential public services. Benefits of unit-based policies include environmental and resource conservation, economic advantages, and greater equity across income levels.
机译:这项研究的目的是了解马萨诸塞州实施基于单位的固体废物管理计划和政策的驱动因素和障碍。主要问题是:“如果州的三分之一城市已经这样做,为什么没有更多的社区在其固体废物管理计划中实施基于单位的系统”,并且由州政府为基于单位的系统提供了大量支持和资源。国家环境保护局。政策子集等问题对低收入个人和家庭的影响;对非法倾倒,固体废物处理量和回收率的影响;分析中还包括社区对已实施计划的成败的看法。检查有无计划的城镇的回收率,以及实施前后的回收率;有和没有计划的城镇当前和以前的垃圾填埋场和焚化炉附近的空间分析;并介绍了有或没有计划的城镇的个案研究。人口分析结果表明,只有总人口对市政一级制定的基于单位的定价政策具有积极影响。实施基于单位计划的城镇的回收率平均提高了12%,回收率与市政一级制定的基于单位的定价政策有关。社区在计划实施后也立即将回收率平均提高了9%。案例研究分析发现,以下一些政策实施障碍:没有政治意愿,居民与社区领袖之间的脱节,行政约束,居民的抵制或缺乏兴趣,缺乏适当的支持计划以及对低收入和低收入的影响的担忧老年人口。除了找到实施成功计划的各种策略外,分析还发现,政策实施的主要驱动力是当前或即将发生的废物处理费变化以及缺乏其他基本公共服务的资金。基于单位的政策的好处包括环境保护和资源保护,经济优势以及不同收入水平之间更大的公平性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Young, Stefanie.;

  • 作者单位

    Tufts University.;

  • 授予单位 Tufts University.;
  • 学科 Engineering Sanitary and Municipal.; Urban and Regional Planning.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 140 p.
  • 总页数 140
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 建筑科学;区域规划、城乡规划;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号