声明
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 Research Background
1.2 Research Purpose
1.3 Research Questions
1.4 Organization of the Thesis
Chapter 2 Literature Review
2.1 A Profile of the Critical Thinking Skill Tasks
2.2 Validity and the View of Unitarian Validity
2.2.1 Definition and Connotations of Validity
2.2.2 The View of Unitary Validity
2.3 Argument-based Approach to Validation
2.3.1 Interpretation/Use Argument
2.3.2Assessment Use Argument
2.4 Rater Consistency Research
2.4.1 The Definition of Rater Consistency and Its Classification
2.4.2 Rater Consistency in MFRM
2.5 Summary of the Chapter
Chapter 3 Methodology
3.1 Research Design
3.2 Participants
3.2.1 Candidates
3.2.2 Raters
3.3 Research Instruments
3.3.1 Rating Scale
3.3.2Assessment Records of the Candidates
3.3.3 FACETS
3.3.4 Rater Interview Protocol
3.5 Data Collection and Analysis
3.5.1Assessment Scores for the Candidates
3.5.2 Interview for the Raters
3.6 Summary of the Chapter
Chapter 4 Results and Discussion
4.1 Results from MFRM
4.1.1 The Outcome from the Vertical Ruler
4.1.2 Rater Measurement Report
4.1.3 Rater Bias Estimates
4.2 Results from the Interview for the Raters
4.2.1 Interview Results on the Categories of the Rating Scales
4.2.2 Interview Results on the Ranks and Descriptors of the Rating Scales
4.2.3 Interview Results on the Practicality of the Rating Scales
4.3 Summary of the Chapter
Chapter 5 Conclusion
5.1 Summary of Research Findings
5.2 Research Contributions
5.3 Research Limitations and Directions for Future Research
参考文献
Appendices
Appendix AThe informed consent form
Appendix B Rating scales for the CTS tasks
Appendix C Rater interview protocol (Chinese version)
Appendix D Rater interview protocol (English version)
Appendix E Interview excerpts (Chinese version)
Appendix F Interview excerpts (English version)
致谢
Research Achievements Obtained During the Postgraduate Period
河北大学;
