首页> 中文学位 >BBS Vs. Traditional Approaches to College Efl Writing Instruction:a Comparative Study
【6h】

BBS Vs. Traditional Approaches to College Efl Writing Instruction:a Comparative Study

代理获取

目录

文摘

英文文摘

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

CHAPTER Ⅰ INTRODUCTION

Statement of the Problem

Purpose of the Study

Hypotheses and Research Questions

Definition of Terms

Significance of the Study

Assumptions

Limitations

Organization of the Study

CHAPTER Ⅱ REVIEW OF LITERATURE

Development of CALL

Theoretical Consideration of the Study

Dulay's Creative Construction Model

Constructivist Theory

CHAPTER Ⅲ METHODOLOGY

Description of the Sample

Instrumentation

Course Design

Tests

Questionnaire

Materials

Collection of Data

Treatment of the Data

Data of Tests

Data of Questionnaire

CHAPTER Ⅳ ANALYSIS OF DATA

Results

Significant Difference between the effects achieved in a BBS-based writing instructional setting and that in a traditional writing instructional setting

Students' Reactions to Applying New Media to College EFL Writing

Summary

CHAPTERⅤ CONCLUSION

Major Findings

Pedagogical Benefits

The Internet Challenges

Discussion and Implications

Suggestions

For E-teacher

For Future Research

RERERENCES

APPENDICES

Appendix One: CET Composition Test Assessment Principle and Criteria.

AppendixTwo:Background Survey

Appendix Three: Questionnaire

AppendixFour:Original Scores of CET-6 Composition Tests by Three Raters

展开▼

摘要

该硕士论文描述了这样一个互动的大学英语写作教学研究课程,一个基于建构主义理论的,BBS形式的教学课程.仔细观察,不难发现学生并没有很大地收益于大学英语写作教学课.作者认为其原因在于相关知识与信息输入的互动建构的不足,而这正是该次课程研究设计的最初动力.同济大学的两组受试学生参与了这项自建的网上写作课程,其目的在于通过比较机辅教学与以教师为主的传统教学的不同效果,试图找到更佳的英语写作教学方法.教学实验过程的描述紧接着实验数据的分析与讨论.实验结果表明,机辅教学在大学英语写作教学中的运用是有效的,为传统教学开辟新境.在最后一章中,作者就理论和教学实践两个层面总结意义,并为进一步的研究提出建议.

著录项

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号