【24h】

The Information Channel Effect in the Winner-take-all: a Multi-Agent Simulation

机译:赢家通吃中的信息渠道效应:多智能体模拟

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We consider the mechanism of the winner-take-all phenomenon in markets in which network externality does not work. The development of information networks has led to the appearance of new economies referred to as "digital economies", in which a winner-take-all phenomenon is observed as a feature. This phenomenon can be explained in terms of network externality, lock-in, and path dependency. We give examples of markets in which this phenomenon is observed, including the OS market and the cellular-phone market. However, a winner-take-all phenomenon is also observed in markets in which'the economic laws of a digital economy do not work. To date, no model explaining this phenomenon has been reported. Thus, to observe the features of this phenomenon, we develop a multi-agent model of communications and consumer behavior, and with it simulate the market phenomenon.In our analysis, we make a clear distinction between Winner-Take-All and Lock-In. That is, Lock-In is one of the factors which produces Winner-Take-All. The term 'Lock-in' is used to refer to a situation in which the cost of converting from specific technologies or goods to other factors is so high as to be nearly impossible. Lock-In exists on individual, organization, and market bases. Winner-Take-All is a phenomenon under which the Lock-In phenomenon advances, involving consumers who are still "locked in". We define the factors which produce the Winner-Take-All and Lock-In phenomena as "Winner-Take-All" and "Lock-In" drivers.Various factors have contributed to the rise of the "Winner-Take-All" phenomenon. One typical such factor is network externality. A number of other factors can also be considered.. We researched the Winner-Take-All phenomenon in several markets, including the mobile telephone, fast-food and music markets, and observed the phenomenon in all of them. Applying traditional economic laws enabled us to understand the mobile phone and fast foods markets, but not the music market. Consequently, we need to develop a model that will enable us to more clearly understand the Winner-Take-All mechanism in markets where network externality is ineffective.
机译:我们考虑了在网络外部性不起作用的市场中“赢家通吃”现象的机制。信息网络的发展导致出现了被称为“数字经济”的新经济体,其中以赢家通吃现象为特征。可以用网络外部性,锁定和路径依赖性来解释这种现象。我们给出了观察到这种现象的市场的例子,包括OS市场和蜂窝电话市场。但是,在数字经济的经济规律不起作用的市场中,也观察到了赢家通吃的现象。迄今为止,还没有报告解释这种现象的模型。因此,为了观察这种现象的特征,我们建立了一个多主体的沟通和消费者行为模型,并模拟了市场现象。在我们的分析中,我们明确区分了Winner-Take-All和Lock-In 。也就是说,锁定是产生“赢家通吃”的因素之一。 “锁定”一词用于指从特定技术或商品转换为其他因素的成本非常高而几乎不可能的情况。锁定存在于个人,组织和市场基础上。赢者通吃是锁定现象发展的一种现象,涉及仍“锁定”的消费者。我们将产生“赢者通吃”和“锁定”现象的因素定义为“赢者通吃”和“锁定”驱动因素。各种因素促使“赢者通吃”现象的产生。一种典型的此类因素是网络外部性。还可以考虑许多其他因素。我们研究了包括移动电话,快餐和音乐市场在内的多个市场的Winner-Take-All现象,并观察了所有这些现象。应用传统的经济法使我们能够了解手机和快餐市场,但不能了解音乐市场。因此,我们需要开发一种模型,使我们能够更清楚地了解在网络外部性无效的市场中的“赢者通吃”机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号