首页> 外文会议>Water quality technology conference and exposition (2005 WQTC conference proceedings) >MONITORING GROUNDWATER AQUIFERS IN ANTICIPATIONOF THE GROUND WATER RULE
【24h】

MONITORING GROUNDWATER AQUIFERS IN ANTICIPATIONOF THE GROUND WATER RULE

机译:监测地下水规则中的地下水含水层

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

An objective of the pending Ground Water Rule (GWR) is to determine which potable groundrnwater sources are vulnerable to fecal contamination so appropriate remediation actions can berntaken. One reason for the delay in finalizing the GWR is disagreement on the fecal indicators tornbe used to determine when that ground water source is free of fecal contamination. Inrnanticipation of the GWR, large volumes (200–1,000 ml) of ground water samples from the islandrnof Kauai were analyzed for all of the microbial fecal indicators (total coliform, Escherichia coli,rnenterococci, Clostridium perfringens, FRNA coliphages, somatic coliphages) being consideredrnunder the GWR. Kauai, one of the smaller island in the state of Hawaii was selected as the studyrnsite because cesspools and septic tanks are extensively used to discharge untreated and poorlyrntreated sewage into shallow sub-surface soil, often over potable water aquifers. Over a 14-monthrnperiod, 48 groundwater samples from 37 wells operated by the County of Kauai and 61rngroundwater samples from 10 wells operated by private water utilities were analyzed. The resultsrnshow that 15% (7/48) of the well water samples operated by the County of Kauai was positivernfor total coliform but none of these samples was positive for E. coli (0/48), enterococci (0/41),rnFRNA coliphages (0/48), somatic coliphages (0/48) and C. perfringens (0/47). In comparison,rn16% (10/61) of the well water samples from private sources was positive for total coliform, 2%rn(1/61) was positive for E. coli, and 11% (6/53) was positive for enterococci. However, none ofrnthese samples was positive for FRNA coliphages (0/61), somatic coliphages (0/61) and C.rnPerfringens (0/56). These results provide evidence that based on monitoring groundwater sourcesrnfor the fecal microorganisms being considered for monitoring under the GWR, the potablerngroundwater sources on the island of Kauai are not vulnerable to contamination with fecalrnmatter. Moreover, the monitoring data show that extensive use of cesspools and septic tanks onrnKauai is not measurably contaminating the potable groundwater sources.
机译:待定的地下水法规(GWR)的目标是确定哪些饮用水源容易受到粪便污染,因此可以采取适当的补救措施。推迟完成GWR的原因之一是在用于确定地下水源何时没有粪便污染的粪便指标上存在分歧。对GWR的预期不足,分析了来自Islandrnof Kauai的大量(200–1,000 ml)地下水样品中的所有微生物粪便指标(总大肠菌群,大肠埃希氏菌,肠球菌,产气荚膜梭状芽胞杆菌,FRNA噬菌体,体性噬菌体) GWR。考艾岛是夏威夷州较小的岛屿之一,被选为研究地点,因为污水池和化粪池被广泛用于将未经处理和未经处理的污水排放到浅层地下土壤中,通常是通过饮用水蓄水层。在14个月的时间里,分析了可爱岛县运营的37口井的48个地下水样品和私人供水公司运营的10口井的61个地下水样品。结果显示,考艾岛县运营的井水样本中有15%(7/48)对大肠菌群呈阳性,但这些样本中没有一个对大肠杆菌(0/48),肠球菌(0/41),rnFRNA呈阳性噬菌体(0/48),体细胞噬菌体(0/48)和产气荚膜梭菌(0/47)。相比之下,私人来源的井水样本中有16%(10/61)的大肠菌群呈阳性,大肠杆菌的阳性率为2%(1/61),大肠杆菌的阳性率为11%(6/53)。肠球菌。但是,这些样品中没有一个对FRNA噬菌体(0/61),体细胞噬菌体(0/61)和产气荚膜梭菌(0.56)呈阳性。这些结果提供了证据,根据对地下水微生物的监测地下水源(考虑在GWR下进行监测),考艾岛上的饮用水源不易受到粪便污染。此外,监测数据表明,在考艾岛上大量使用污水池和化粪池并没有明显地污染饮用水源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号