【24h】

Managing Polarities in Pursuit of Quality

机译:追求品质中的两极分化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

One of the questions for this conference is "can complexity be managed or are we destined for complete chaos?" The key concept in that phrase is that of managing complexity, versus being at the whims of a complex system. Sometimes a sense of powerlessness results from treating interdependent factors as independent of one another and then being surprised at the negative impacts that occur because we weren't aware of their interrelatedness. For example, taking the stance "we need to focus on quality no matter what it costs or how long it takes" could result in a wildly over-budget project that is obsolete or of no interest to the customer by the time it is released. This is more likely in a situation in which costs and time to market aren't proactively managed at some level. The opposite also holds true, going for speed at the expense of quality, or cost at the expense of quality might mean losing customers' trust and business, beginning a downward slide that finishes the organization. The reality is that all of these factors are important and influence each other to some degree: quality AND cost AND time to develop. These are just a few dynamics that may be competing with each other in our world.
机译:这次会议的问题之一是“可以管理复杂性还是我们注定要彻底陷入混乱?”该短语中的关键概念是管理复杂性,而不是随心所欲地使用复杂系统。有时,将相互依存的因素视为彼此独立,然后由于我们不知道它们之间的相互关系而产生的负面影响而感到无能为力。例如,采取“无论花费多少成本或花费多长时间,我们都必须专注于质量”的立场,这可能导致预算过高的项目变得过时,或者在发布之时对客户不感兴趣。在某种程度上没有主动管理成本和上市时间的情况下,这种可能性更大。相反的情况也是如此,以质量为代价追求速度,或者以质量为代价追求成本可能意味着失去客户的信任和业务,从而开始下滑,从而使组织变得完整。现实是所有这些因素都很重要,并且在一定程度上相互影响:质量,成本和开发时间。这些只是在我们的世界中可能相互竞争的一些动力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号