首页> 外文会议>Transportation – investing in our future >RETHINKING TRANSPORTATION TARGETS – A CASE FORMOVING BEYOND BASIC MODAL SHARE TARGETS
【24h】

RETHINKING TRANSPORTATION TARGETS – A CASE FORMOVING BEYOND BASIC MODAL SHARE TARGETS

机译:重新考虑运输目标–超越基本模态份额目标的案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Most Transportation Master Plans for major urban areas in Canada establish targetsrnfor transportation demand management. Typically these targets focus on transit modalrnshares or transit use; however, approaches for developing the actual targets varyrnconsiderably. Some municipalities “back-calculate” required mode split targets byrnexamining future peak hour road capacity deficiencies on a screenline basis. Otherrnareas adopt a broader approach and simply assume that if rapidly growing auto use isrnbad, than more transit use must be good, and consequently set very high goals forrntransit mode shares.rnWhile there appears to be little consistency in approaches for setting transportationrndemand targets, there is some consistency in the fact that modal share targets arerngenerally not being achieved. At best, most urban transit systems struggle to maintainrnexisting mode shares, let alone increase their mode shares. Perhaps more alarming isrnthe fact that auto use continues to grow at a staggering rate. The most recentrnTransportation Association of Canada (TAC) Urban Indicators Survey [1] revealed thatrngasoline fuel use per capita, a measure of auto dependency, grew by more than 11%rnbetween 1991 and 2001.rnThis paper will present a critical review of how and why traditional transportation modernshare targets are failing to result in more sustainable transportation, as measured byrnreduced growth in auto usage and increased transit use. A proposed approach isrnoutlined for establishing and achieving urban transportation targets, including arnframework that bases transportation targets on auto use as well as transit modernshares. It is argued that this fundamental target better reflects the objectives that mostrnmunicipalities are trying to achieve when they are setting targets. It is also expectedrnthat this approach will assist municipalities in establishing transportation policies andrnplans that help achieve federal commitments for reducing greenhouse gas emissions,rnaddress a growing link between auto dependency and health problems, and preparernfor a possible future wherein the availability of energy supply may not sustain currentrnauto behaviour.
机译:加拿大主要城市地区的大多数运输总体规划都为运输需求管理制定了目标。通常,这些目标侧重于过境模式共享或过境使用;然而,制定实际目标的方法差异很大。一些市政当局通过对未来高峰时段的道路通行能力不足进行审查,从而“反算”了所需的模式划分目标。其他区域则采用更广泛的方法,并简单地假设,如果快速增长的汽车使用率是不好的,那么必须要有更多的过境使用率,因此为过境模式份额设定了很高的目标。尽管设定运输需求目标的方法似乎不一致,但是存在通常不会实现模式共享目标这一事实具有一定的一致性。充其量,大多数城市交通系统都在努力维持现有的模式份额,更不用说增加其模式份额了。也许更令人震惊的是,汽车使用量持续以惊人的速度增长。加拿大交通运输协会(TAC)最新的城市指标调查[1]显示,人均汽油燃料使用量(一种汽车依赖性)在1991年至2001年之间增长了11%以上。本文将对如何以及为什么进行批判性回顾。传统的运输方式现代共享目标未能实现更可持续的运输,这可以通过减少汽车使用量的增长和增加运输工具的使用来衡量。概述了用于建立和实现城市交通目标的提议方法,包括基于汽车使用和现代共享交通的交通目标的框架。有人认为,这一基本目标更好地反映了大多数城市在设定目标时试图达到的目标。还可以预计,这种方法将有助于市政当局制定运输政策和计划,以帮助实现减少温室气体排放的联邦承诺,解决汽车依赖与健康问题之间日益紧密的联系,并为可能无法维持能源供应的未来做好准备当前行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号