首页> 外文会议>Thirty-Second Semiconductor Thermal Measurement and Management Symposium >Green performance characterization of electronics cooling methods: From air through hybrid to direct two phase touch cooling
【24h】

Green performance characterization of electronics cooling methods: From air through hybrid to direct two phase touch cooling

机译:电子冷却方法的绿色性能表征:从空气通过混合动力到直接两相接触式冷却

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

As high-powered computing (HPC) and telecom server equipment continues to move towards higher power densities, reaching over 3 kW per blade [1], cooling at the blade, cabinet, and data center level becomes an increasingly important concern for data centers as well as for computing equipment manufacturers. In many data centers, cooling systems account for up to ???70% of the total electricity consumed [2], resulting in an unnecessarily high operating expense. As many equipment manufacturers move to higher powers, air cooling at the blade-level becomes more of a challenge, and liquid cooling options are often implemented to allow equipment to operate at higher powers. Pumped liquid cooling has been shown to be more efficient than air cooling in terms of thermal resistance and cost of electricity [3], and operating expense [4], but not all liquid-cooled methods have the same advantages. This article examines three different liquid cooling approaches, shown on Figure 1, to provide a comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of each option.
机译:随着高功率计算(HPC)和电信服务器设备不断向更高的功率密度发展,每个刀片服务器的功率超过3 kW [1],刀片服务器,机柜和数据中心级别的冷却已成为数据中心日益关注的问题。以及用于计算设备制造商。在许多数据中心中,冷却系统最多占总电力消耗的70%[2],从而导致不必要的高昂运营费用。随着许多设备制造商采用更高的功率,叶片级的空气冷却变得更加困难,并且通常采用液冷选件以使设备以更高的功率运行。在热阻和电力成本[3]和运行费用[4]方面,泵送液体冷却已被证明比空气冷却更有效,但并非所有液体冷却方法都具有相同的优势。本文研究了如图1所示的三种不同的液体冷却方法,以比较每个选项的优缺点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号