首页> 外文会议>Semiconductor Thermal Measurement and Management Symposium >Green performance characterization of electronics cooling methods: From air through hybrid to direct two phase touch cooling
【24h】

Green performance characterization of electronics cooling methods: From air through hybrid to direct two phase touch cooling

机译:电子冷却方法的绿色性能表征:从空气通过杂种直接两相触摸冷却

获取原文

摘要

As high-powered computing (HPC) and telecom server equipment continues to move towards higher power densities, reaching over 3 kW per blade [1], cooling at the blade, cabinet, and data center level becomes an increasingly important concern for data centers as well as for computing equipment manufacturers. In many data centers, cooling systems account for up to ???70% of the total electricity consumed [2], resulting in an unnecessarily high operating expense. As many equipment manufacturers move to higher powers, air cooling at the blade-level becomes more of a challenge, and liquid cooling options are often implemented to allow equipment to operate at higher powers. Pumped liquid cooling has been shown to be more efficient than air cooling in terms of thermal resistance and cost of electricity [3], and operating expense [4], but not all liquid-cooled methods have the same advantages. This article examines three different liquid cooling approaches, shown on Figure 1, to provide a comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of each option.
机译:随着高功率计算(HPC)和电信服务器设备继续走向更高的功率密度,每个刀片达到3千瓦,在刀片,机柜和数据中心级别的冷却成为数据中心的越来越重要的关注以及计算设备制造商。在许多数据中心中,冷却系统占耗电量的最多70%的耗电[2],导致不必要的高运营费用。由于许多设备制造商移动到更高的功率,刀片水平的空气冷却变得更加挑战,并且通常实施液体冷却选择以允许设备在更高的功率下运行。泵送的液体冷却已被证明比在热阻和电力成本方面比空气冷却更有效[3],并且操作费用[4],但并非所有液体冷却方法具有相同的优点。本文研究了三种不同的液体冷却方法,如图1所示,提供了每个选项的优缺点的比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号