【24h】

THE FUJITA SCALE: ITS ABUSE AND THE CURE

机译:FUJITA量表:其滥用和解决方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

T. Theodore Fujita (1970) developed the Fujita scale in an attempt to categorize tornadoes by intensity and area. The scale is based upon the degree of damage caused by individual tornadoes. The scale became popular after the Super Outbreak of tornadoes which occurred April 3-4, 1974. Fujita and his staff at the University of Chicago examined tornado tracks and damage across 13 states in the Upper Midwest and rated 148 tornadoes that occurred within thirteen hours causing 600 million dollars damage. There has been use of the F-Scale as an observational tool applying the rating of a tornado by its loo ks a nd siz e rath er than the dam age it caused. This poses the question: What does the F-Scale really tell us about individual tornadoes? Does the damage path length and width tell us whether a tornado was actually worthy of the rating of F5, or F1 ? If a mile wide tornado occurs in an open field causing little damage, it may be rated F1. Similarly, we have seen thin tornadoes produce damage less than 1/4-mile that were rated F4. This paper attempts to address these issues through examination of the strengths and weaknesses of the F-Scale and how the information must be used cautiously.
机译:T.西奥多·藤田(Theodore Fujita)(1970)开发了藤田量表,试图对龙卷风按强度和面积进行分类。等级基于单个龙卷风造成的损坏程度。在1974年4月3-4日发生的龙卷风超级爆发之后,这种比例变得很受欢迎。Fujita和他在芝加哥大学的工作人员检查了中西部上13个州的龙卷风径迹和破坏情况,并对在13个小时内发生的148次龙卷风造成了严重影响。损失6亿美元。 F-Scale已被用作观测工具,它根据龙卷风的潜在损失和严重程度来评估龙卷风的等级。这就提出了一个问题:F-Scale能真正告诉我们有关龙卷风的哪些信息?损伤路径的长度和宽度是否告诉我们龙卷风是否真正值得F5或F1的等级?如果在空旷地区发生一英里宽的龙卷风,几乎没有损坏,则其等级可能为F1。同样,我们已经看到薄龙卷风产生的损伤小于1/4英里,其额定值为F4。本文试图通过检查F量表的优缺点以及如何谨慎使用信息来解决这些问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号