首页> 外文会议>Symposium on Evaluation and Remediation of Low Permeability and Dual Porosity Environments Jan 25, 2001 Reno, Nevada >Evaluation of Constant Head Infiltration Test Analysis Methods for Field Estimation of Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity of Compacted Clay Liners
【24h】

Evaluation of Constant Head Infiltration Test Analysis Methods for Field Estimation of Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity of Compacted Clay Liners

机译:压实粘土衬砌饱和水电导率现场估算的恒压入渗试验分析方法的评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Field infiltration tests are commonly used to assess the hydraulic conductivity of low permeability materials such as natural clay barriers and compacted clay liners. The soils used for compacted clay liners are always partially saturated and require very long testing times to reach steady-state flow conditions. Consequently, because they are less time consuming, laboratory tests are usually preferred for construction quality control. Nevertheless, it is well-known that field tests are more representative of the clay liner because of the scale effect. This is why, since the 1980s, the main issues associated with field procedures have been studied and several methods proposed for testing low-permeability materials within short time periods. The proposed methods are based on early-time flow analysis in unsaturated conditions and have been applied to various compacted soils under field and laboratory conditions. To evaluate these methods, we carried out a comprehensive testing program using a hydraulic field infiltrometer method (sealed single-ring infiltrometer) and a laboratory rigid-wall permeameter method that reproduces surface field test conditions. The laboratory tests were continued until saturated hydraulic conductivity was obtained so that this value could be compared against the hydraulic conductivity estimated from early-time analysis on the same specimen. The obtained results show the influence of (a) the initial moisture content, (b) the sorptivity and hydraulic head on the early-time infiltration rate, and (c) the final estimated hydraulic conductivity. A comparison of analysis methods shows the limitations of some and tries to explain the reasons for such inadequacies in the description of early-time unsaturated flows. Nevertheless, the conclusions of our study show that conventional early-time analyses give a good estimation of saturated hydraulic conductivity within a short time period compatible with construction quality-control procedures.
机译:现场渗透测试通常用于评估低渗透性材料(例如天然粘土屏障和压实粘土衬里)的水力传导率。用于压实粘土衬里的土壤总是部分饱和,需要很长的测试时间才能达到稳态流动条件。因此,由于它们耗时少,因此通常首选实验室测试来控制建筑质量。然而,众所周知,由于结垢效应,现场测试更能代表粘土衬里。这就是为什么自1980年代以来一直研究与现场程序相关的主要问题,并提出了几种在短时间内测试低渗透率材料的方法的原因。所提出的方法基于不饱和条件下的早期流动分析,并已应用于野外和实验室条件下的各种压实土壤。为了评估这些方法,我们使用液压场渗透仪(密封的单环渗透仪)和实验室刚性壁渗透仪方法(可再现表面场测试条件)进行了全面的测试程序。继续进行实验室测试,直到获得饱和的水力传导率,以便可以将该值与根据同一样品的早期分析估计的水力传导率进行比较。获得的结果表明:(a)初始水分含量,(b)吸水率和水头对早期渗透率的影响以及(c)最终估算的水力传导率的影响。分析方法的比较显示了某些方法的局限性,并试图在描述早期非饱和流时解释此类不足的原因。尽管如此,我们的研究结论表明,常规的早期分析可以在短时间内对饱和导水率做出很好的估算,这与施工质量控制程序兼容。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号