首页> 外文会议>Second Australasian ground control in mining conference >Pillar Design Procedures and Research Methodologies - Can There or Should There be a Unified Approach?
【24h】

Pillar Design Procedures and Research Methodologies - Can There or Should There be a Unified Approach?

机译:支柱设计程序和研究方法论-是否应该有统一的方法?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

After some 50 years of worldwide research in relation to coal pillar mechanics and design as well as numerous workshops and technical papers related to these issues there is still some significant disagreement as to the approach one should adopt in the assessment and design of a coal pillar. Of course there are many different types of coal pillars that fulfil a wide range of roles at any particular mine and in this instance it is appropriate to have a 'tailored' approach for each pillar type in relation to the role it fulfils. However where it can become very difficult for the mine operators is when various researchers or consultants use or recommend significantly different approaches for the same type of pillar fulfilling the same role. By 1999 two pillar design techniques had been developed specifically for the Australian underground coal mining industry (ie The University of New South Wales Pillar Design Procedure, UNSW PDP and Analysis of Longwall Tailgate Serviceability, ALTS) and several other pillar design techniques were being practiced by individual consultants. The Australian industry hoped to resolve the issue of what technique to use for each pillar type and role, when it funded UNSW in 2000 to develop a 'Systems Approach to Pillar Design'. The findings of the abovementioned project were published in 2005 and while every attempt was made by UNSW to include the views of various local and overseas researchers and consultants it would be fair to say that a unified approach to pillar design in Australia was not adopted as a result of that project. This is the experience of one country where there has never been one central group solely undertaking such research in relation to pillar design (such as the Chamber of Mines in South Africa). This paper explores the Australian experience in terms of pillar research and what that experience may offer to researchers in Australia and other countries. At the First Australasian Ground Control in Mining Conference (2003) the first 'update' of the ALTS Design Methodology (ie ALTS II) was presented. In subsequent years the ALTS database was continually updated and significantly expanded such that it now includes detailed information in relation to both the tailgate (148 cases) and maingate belt road (58 cases). In addition to tailgate roof support and chain pillar design, the current version of ALTS (referred to as ALTS 2009) includes a maingate belt road roof support design module. This paper is also intended to update and summarise the development and application of the ALTS Design Methodology for longwall gateroad design over the last decade both directly and in the context of coal pillar research conducted in Australia over the last 15 years.
机译:在有关煤柱力学和设计的全球研究已有50年之久,以及与这些问题有关的众多讲习班和技术论文之后,人们对于在煤柱的评估和设计中应采用的方法仍存在重大分歧。当然,在任何特定的煤矿中,都有许多不同类型的煤炭支柱可以扮演各种各样的角色,在这种情况下,针对每种支柱类型,根据其所扮演的角色,采用“量身定制”的方法是适当的。但是,对于不同的研究人员或顾问来说,对于使用相同类型的支柱来发挥相同作用的研究人员或顾问而言,这可能会变得非常困难。到1999年,已经针对澳大利亚地下煤矿业开发了两种支柱设计技术(即,新南威尔士大学支柱设计程序,UNSW PDP和长壁尾门可服务性分析,ALTS),并且正在实践其他几种支柱设计技术。个人顾问。澳大利亚工业界在2000年资助UNSW开发“支柱设计系统方法”时,希望解决对每种支柱类型和角色使用哪种技术的问题。上述项目的调查结果已于2005年发布,尽管UNSW尽一切努力吸收本地和海外研究人员和顾问的意见,但可以肯定地说,澳大利亚并没有采用统一的支柱设计方法。该项目的结果。这是一个国家的经验,在这个国家中,从来没有一个中央集团专门从事有关支柱设计的研究(例如南非的矿商会)。本文从支柱研究的角度探讨了澳大利亚的经验,以及该经验可以为澳大利亚和其他国家的研究人员提供什么。在2003年第一届澳大利亚采矿地面控制大会上,首次提出了ALTS设计方法(即ALTS II)的“更新”。在随后的几年中,ALTS数据库得到了不断的更新和显着扩展,因此它现在包括有关后挡板(148例)和主闸带公路(58例)的详细信息。除了后挡板车顶支架和链柱设计之外,ALTS的当前版本(称为ALTS 2009)还包括一个主闸带式公路车顶支架设计模块。本文还意在直接和在过去15年中在澳大利亚进行的煤炭支柱研究的背景下,更新和总结用于长壁闸道设计的ALTS设计方法论的开发和应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号