首页> 外文会议>Risk Analysis VI: Simulation and Hazard Mitigation >Ranking risky alternatives: innovations in subjective utility analysis
【24h】

Ranking risky alternatives: innovations in subjective utility analysis

机译:对风险替代方案进行排名:主观效用分析的创新

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Over the past 50 years there have been innovations in the quantitative methods available to rank risky alternatives (mean-variance (MV), first degree stochastic dominance (FSD), and second degree stochastic dominance (SDS)). Two recent innovations, stochastic efficiency with respect to a function (SERF) and Stoplight are compared to MV, FSD, and SDS to demonstrate the strengths and weaknesses of each method. The results indicate that SERF and Stoplight are powerful tools that do not suffer from some of the limitations as the other risk ranking methods.
机译:在过去的50年中,在量化风险替代方法(均方差(MV),一级随机优势(FSD)和二级随机优势(SDS))的定量方法方面进行了创新。比较了两项最新的创新,即相对于功能的随机效率(SERF)和Stoplight与MV,FSD和SDS的比较,以证明每种方法的优缺点。结果表明,SERF和Stoplight是功能强大的工具,不会像其他风险排名方法那样受到某些限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号