首页> 外文会议>Rewriting Techniques and Applications >Revisiting Cut-Elimination: One Difficult Proof Is Really a Proof
【24h】

Revisiting Cut-Elimination: One Difficult Proof Is Really a Proof

机译:重新考虑消除切割:一个困难的证明确实是一个证明

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Powerful proof techniques, such as logical relation arguments, have been developed for establishing the strong normalisation property of term-rewriting systems. The first author used such a logical relation argument to establish strong normalising for a cut-elimination procedure in classical logic. He presented a rather complicated, but informal, proof establishing this property. The difficulties in this proof arise from a quite subtle substitution operation, which implements proof transformation that permute cuts over other inference rules. We have formalised this proof in the theorem prover Isabelle/HOL using the Nominal Datatype Package, closely following the informal proof given by the first author in his PhD-thesis. In the process, we identified and resolved a gap in one central lemma and a number of smaller problems in others. We also needed to make one informal definition rigorous. We thus show that the original proof is indeed a proof and that present automated proving technology is adequate for formalising such difficult proofs.
机译:已经开发了强大的证明技术(例如逻辑关系参数)来建立术语重写系统的强大归一化属性。第一作者使用这种逻辑关系参数为经典逻辑中的割除过程建立了强规范化。他提供了一个相当复杂但非正式的证明来证明此属性。该证明中的困难源于相当微妙的替换操作,该替换操作实现了证明转换而削减了其他推理规则。我们已经使用定理数据类型包在定理证明者Isabelle / HOL中正式确定了该证明,紧随第一作者在其博士学位论文中提供的非正式证明。在此过程中,我们确定并解决了一个中心引理中的空白,而另一个则解决了一些较小的问题。我们还需要严格地定义一个非正式的定义。因此,我们证明了原始证明确实是一个证明,并且当前的自动证明技术足以将这种困难的证明形式化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号