【24h】

Are specialist robots better than generalist robots?

机译:专业机器人是否比通才机器人更好?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

When a robot is said to be a specialist in a particular domain, does it alter the nature and quality of human-robot interaction? This study examines the effects of specialization in robot functions, along with individual difference in immersive tendencies, on users' trust, perception, activity, and memory. In a controlled experiment, 38 participants were taught a physical exercise lesson from either a specialist or generalist humanoid robot for 6 min. Results showed that specialization had effects on the participants' affective trust; and immersive tendency predicted active participation in the interaction and led to better memory. The latter also moderated the effect of the former—users with higher immersive tendency are more likely to make human attributions of specialization, and rate a specialist robot as more intelligent than a generalist robot. These results have theoretical implications for media-equation as well as design implications for human-robot interaction professionals.
机译:当说机器人是特定领域的专家时,它是否会改变人机交互的性质和质量?这项研究研究了机器人功能的专业化以及沉浸趋势的个体差异对用户的信任,感知,活动和记忆的影响。在一个受控实验中,向38名参与者讲授了6分钟的专家或普通人形机器人的体育锻炼课程。结果表明,专业化对参与者的情感信任有影响。身临其境的趋势预示着人们将积极参与互动,并带来更好的记忆。后者也减轻了前者的影响-身临其境的倾向较高的用户更有可能将人类的专业化属性归功于他们,并认为专业机器人比通才机器人更智能。这些结果对媒体方程具有理论意义,对人机交互专业人员也有设计意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号