【24h】

Experimental Evaluation of Pen-based Chinese Word Processing Usability

机译:基于笔的中文单词处理可用性的实验评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

An evaluation experiment was conducted to compare four interface styles: Hanwang Fixed Window, Translucent Mobile Single Window, Translucent Mobile Double Window, and No Window. Subjects tested the four styles for typical word process task, including input, insert, exchange on a free style text edit system. The results show that the TMDW was the most efficient and the most accurate mode, in terms of total editing time and accuracy rate. Also experimental data exhibited that NW is the most nature style, in terms of the subjects' preferences. This experiment confirmed that a proper employment of interface style could improve the interactive efficiency of text editing systems. Our tests for the first time give statistical support to the view that the nature gesture is useful for editing interface for word process systems.
机译:进行了一个评估实验,以比较四种界面样式:汉王固定窗口,半透明移动单窗口,半透明移动双窗口和无窗口。主题测试了四种典型的单词处理任务样式,包括在自由样式文本编辑系统上的输入,插入,交换。结果表明,就总编辑时间和准确率而言,TMDW是最有效和最准确的模式。实验数据还表明,就受试者的喜好而言,西北是最自然的风格。该实验证实,正确使用界面样式可以提高文本编辑系统的交互效率。我们的测试首次为统计学观点提供了支持,即自然手势对于编辑文字处理系统的界面很有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号