首页> 外文会议>Human Factors and Ergonomics Society international annual meeting;Human Factors and Ergonomics Society >Measuring the Usability of Home Healthcare Devices Using Retrospective Measures
【24h】

Measuring the Usability of Home Healthcare Devices Using Retrospective Measures

机译:使用回顾性措施衡量家庭医疗保健设备的可用性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

As the trend of home-delivered healthcare grows, the number of healthcare devices being utilized in the home setting also increases greatly, but the usability of all these devices has not been systematically exam-ined. While traditional in-lab usability testing is too time-consuming to make broad assessments of a large number of home healthcare devices, retrospective evaluation techniques using subjective usability surveys may be more promising because of their time and resource efficiency. However, the equivalence of data collected with these two techniques is not well understood for medical devices. This study collected usabil-ity data for multiple healthcare devices from 74 subjects in laboratory usability testing and 395 subjects using a retrospective assessment survey. Measures of overall subjective usability (measured using the Sys-tem Usability Scale) and the ISO usability metrics of effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction were cap-tured in both methods. Results show a consistency in satisfaction and overall subjective usability scores between the retrospective survey and laboratory testing, while measures of effectiveness and efficiency differed. These results suggest that retrospective surveys are capable of capturing the overall usability of a product by using the System Usability Scale metric. Such a finding should increase the confidence of re-searchers and practitioners who wish to use retrospective measures as a quick and economical technique in the large-scale assessment of medical devices. However, researchers should be cautious about measuring individual ISO usability metrics with retrospective surveys, as there are pronounced differences between lab-based usability testing and retrospective assessments.
机译:随着家庭提供的医疗保健的趋势的增长,在家庭环境中使用的医疗保健设备的数量也大大增加,但是尚未对所有这些设备的可用性进行系统地检查。尽管传统的实验室内可用性测试过于费时,无法对大量的家用医疗设备进行广泛的评估,但是使用主观可用性调查的回顾性评估技术由于其时间和资源效率而可能更具前景。但是,对于医疗设备,用这两种技术收集的数据的等效性还不是很清楚。这项研究收集了74个实验室可用性测试受试者和395个受试者的回顾性评估调查中的多种医疗保健设备的可用性数据。两种方法均捕获了总体主观可用性的度量(使用系统可用性量表进行度量)以及有效性,效率和满意度的ISO可用性度量。结果显示,回顾性调查与实验室测试在满意度和总体主观可用性得分上具有一致性,而有效性和效率的衡量标准却有所不同。这些结果表明,回顾性调查能够通过使用系统可用性量表度量标准来捕获产品的总体可用性。这样的发现应该增加研究者和从业者的信心,他们希望在医疗器械的大规模评估中使用回顾性措施作为一种快速,经济的技术。但是,由于基于实验室的可用性测试和回顾性评估之间存在明显差异,因此研究人员在使用回顾性调查来衡量单个ISO可用性指标时应谨慎。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号