首页> 外文会议>Optical Elastography and Tissue Biomechanics III >A comparative study of shear wave speed estimation techniques in optical coherence elastography applications
【24h】

A comparative study of shear wave speed estimation techniques in optical coherence elastography applications

机译:光学相干弹性成像中剪切波速度估计技术的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Optical Coherence Elastography (OCE) is a widely investigated noninvasive technique for estimating the mechanical properties of tissue. In particular, vibrational OCE methods aim to estimate the shear wave velocity generated by an external stimulus in order to calculate the elastic modulus of tissue. In this study, we compare the performance of five acquisition and processing techniques for estimating the shear wave speed in simulations and experiments using tissue-mimicking phantoms. Accuracy, contrast-to-noise ratio, and resolution are measured for all cases. The first two techniques make the use of one piezoelectric actuator for generating a continuous shear wave propagation (SWP) and a tone-burst propagation (TBP) of 400 Hz over the gelatin phantom. The other techniques make use of one additional actuator locatec on the opposite side of the region of interest in order to create an interference pattern. When both actuators have the same frequency, a standing wave (SW) pattern is generated. Otherwise, when there is a frequency differencedf between both actuators, a crawling wave (CrW) pattern is generated and propagates with less speed than a shear wave, which makes in suitable for being detected by the 2D cross-sectional OCE imaging. Ifdf is not small compared to the operational frequency, the CrW travels faster and a sampled version of it (SCrW) is acquired by the system. Preliminary results suggest that TBF (error < 4.1 %) and SWP (error < 6%) techniques are more accurate when compared to mechanical measurement test results.
机译:光学相干弹性成像(OCE)是一种广泛研究的非侵入性技术,用于估计组织的机械性能。特别地,振动OCE方法旨在估计由外部刺激产生的剪切波速度,以便计算组织的弹性模量。在这项研究中,我们在使用组织模仿体模的仿真和实验中比较了五种采集和处理技术在估计剪切波速度方面的性能。在所有情况下均会测量准确性,对比度,噪声比和分辨率。前两种技术利用一个压电致动器在明胶体模上产生400 Hz的连续剪切波传播(SWP)和音爆传播(TBP)。其他技术利用在感兴趣区域的相对侧上的一个附加致动器定位c,以产生干涉图样。当两个执行器具有相同的频率时,将生成驻波(SW)模式。否则,当两个致动器之间存在频率差f时,将生成爬行波(CrW)模式并以比剪切波小的速度传播,这使其适合于通过2D截面OCE成像进行检测。如果df与工作频率相比不小,则CrW的传播速度会更快,系统会获取它的采样版本(SCrW)。初步结果表明,与机械测量测试结果相比,TBF(误差<4.1%)和SWP(误差<6%)技术更为准确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号