首页> 外文会议>Offshore technology conference >Production Issues Influencing The Choice Of Completion Type In Horizontal Wells With Sanding Problems
【24h】

Production Issues Influencing The Choice Of Completion Type In Horizontal Wells With Sanding Problems

机译:有打磨问题的水平井中完井类型选择的生产问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The aim of this study was to examine wells in the same sandrnbodies in a field (designated as F1) in West Africa torndetermine which sand control completion option was the morernefficient in a given situation, expandable sand screens (ESS?),rnexternal open hole gravel packs, stand alone screens andrnslotted/perforated liners.rnThe planned basis for comparison was to compare thernproductivity index per foot for each completion type. Therernwere expandable screens, slotted and predrilled linerrncompletions in the same sand body in the F1 field. The slottedrnand predrilled liners all had PLT logs from which to calculaternPI values and the ESS well did not. The PI for the ESS wellrnhad therefore to be calculated using well inflow software.rnThis then allowed a direct ranking of the PI/ft for eachrncompletion type. The ESS well had the highest PI/ft of therncompletions at 0.45 bpd/psi/ft; as compared to the slottedrnliners at 0.04-0.18 and the predrilled liners at 0.10-0.17. Onernother horizontal ESS well in a similar field (designated F2)rnwas also used because it did have accurate PI informationrnfrom a PLT log. This gave a PI/ft = 0.57 bopd/psi/ft which isrnsimilar to the simulated value for the ESS well in the F1 field.rnAnother aspect of the different completions is the variationrnin friction pressure between completion types such as ESSrnscreens and EGP. The friction pressures in an ESS completionrnare lower than a typical EGP, standalone screen or slotted linerrncompletion. This gives a very homogeneous inflow profile forrnthe ESS completion due to the increased production bore.rnThe EGP completion has a higher flow at the heel of the well;rnthis accelerates water influx. The heel breakthrough time wasrncalculated using an analytical model for the ESS and EGPrncompletions for the F1 ESS well configuration. For the ESSrncompletion, the predicted water breakthrough time was 191rn? ESS is a registered trademark of Weatherford Lamb Incrndays, which was close to the observed value in the well. Thernsmallest EGP completion had predicted water breakthrough inrn88 days.rnNumerical simulations were also used to better understandrnwater inflow and to test the assumptions in the analyticalrnmodel. The simulations show a similar behaviour to thernanalytical model with water cresting up rapidly to the heel ofrnthe EGP well.
机译:这项研究的目的是在西非某油田(称为F1)中检查同一砂体中的油井,以确定在给定情况下哪种防砂完井方案是最有效的,可膨胀砂筛(ESS?),外部裸眼碎石包装,独立的筛网和开槽的/穿孔的衬里。比较的计划基础是比较每种完井类型每英尺的生产率指数。 F1田地的同一砂体中有可扩展的筛网,开槽和预钻的衬管完井。开槽的和预钻孔的衬管都具有PLT测井曲线,可从中计算PI值,而ESS井则没有。因此,必须使用井内流入软件来计算ESS井的PI。然后,可以直接对每种完井类型的PI / ft进行排名。 ESS井的完井PI / ft最高,为0.45 bpd / psi / ft;与开槽衬管为0.04-0.18和预钻孔衬管为0.10-0.17相比。由于在PLT测井中确实具有准确的PI信息,因此也使用了类似领域的另一个水平ESS(称为F2)。这样得出的PI / ft = 0.57 bopd / psi / ft,与F1油田ESS井的模拟值相似。 ESS完井中的摩擦压力低于典型的EGP,独立筛网或开槽衬管完井。由于增加了生产井眼,这为ESS完井提供了非常均匀的流入剖面。rn EGP完井在井底有更高的流量;这加速了水的涌入。使用ESS的解析模型和F1 ESS井配置的EGPrn完井量计算后跟突破时间。对于ESSrncompletion,预测的水突破时间为191rn? ESS是Weatherford Lamb Incrndays的注册商标,接近于在井中的观察值。 EGP最小的完井量可以预测88天的水突破。数值模拟还可以用来更好地了解水的流入并检验分析模型中的假设。模拟显示出与热分析模型相似的行为,其中水迅速上升到EGP井的底部。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Offshore technology conference》|2003年|p.1-10|共10页
  • 会议地点 Houston TX(US);Houston TX(US)
  • 作者

    Colin Jones; John Cameron;

  • 作者单位

    Weatherford Completion Systems, Oladele Owoeye and Thijs Baaijens, ShellInternational Exploration and Production;

    Weatherford Completion Systems, Oladele Owoeye and Thijs Baaijens, ShellInternational Exploration and Production;

  • 会议组织
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 深海工程、近海工程;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号