【24h】

Dynamic Models of Coalition Formation: Fallback Vs. Build-Up

机译:联盟形成的动态模型:后备vs。建立

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Players are assumed to rank each other as coalition partners. Two processes of coalition formation are defined and illustrated: 1. Fallback (FB): Players seek coalition partners by descending lower and lower in their preference rankings until some majority coalition, all of whose members consider each other mutually acceptable, forms. 2. Build-up (BU): Same descent as FB, except only majorities whose members rank each other highest form coalitions. BU coalitions are stable in the sense that no member would prefer to be in another coalition, whereas FB coalitions, whose members need not rank each other highest, may not be stable. BU coalitions are bimodally distributed in a random society, with peaks around simple majority and unanimity; the distributions of majorities in the US Supreme Court and in the US House of Representatives follow this pattern. Other examples of real-life coalition processes are discussed.
机译:假定玩家将彼此排为联盟伙伴。定义并说明了联盟形成的两个过程:1.后备(FB):玩家通过逐渐降低其偏好等级来寻找联盟伙伴,直到某个多数联盟(其成员相互​​认为彼此可以接受)形成为止。 2.建立(BU):与FB相同的下降,只是多数成员彼此组成最高联盟。从没有成员愿意加入另一个联盟的意义上讲,BU联盟是稳定的,而成员之间无需排名最高的FB联盟则可能不稳定。 BU联盟在一个随机的社会中是双峰分布的,其高峰围绕简单多数和一致。美国最高法院和美国众议院的多数派议员都遵循这种模式。讨论了现实生活中的联合过程的其他示例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号