首页> 外文会议>NATO Advanced Research Workshops 1999; 2000 Bucharest; Piestany >MOLECULAR BIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES FOR SUBSPECIES IDENTIFICATION: IMMUNOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES A COMPARISON
【24h】

MOLECULAR BIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES FOR SUBSPECIES IDENTIFICATION: IMMUNOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES A COMPARISON

机译:用于鉴定亚种的分子生物学技术:免疫学技术的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Several immunological techniques such as ELISA or western blotting are available that offer means of relatively easy and rapid identification of microbial agents at realistic limits of detection, that is, in the nanogram to femtogram ranges. Other techniques that are somewhat more difficult to perform such as surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy nevertheless in controlled experiments permit detection of subtle changes in antigen epitope topology that can provide valuable information about the character of the microorganism, for example, if it is a mutant. Such methods can be used as a first indication of variance by a particular strain of microorganism, but the last proof has to be obtained by genetic analysis, for example information provided by PCR or nucleotide sequencing. In order to detect strain variants by immunological methods, antigenic variation must reflect strain variation, and there must be a panel of antibodies available with defined binding properties for all different possible antigenic variants. This is a formidable criterion that has to be met, but one approach might be to develop antibodies through molecular biological techniques that bind to conserved or generic determinants of the antigen in question, and follow up this assay with another using antibodies recognizing strain differences. It would also be useful to have a panel of antibodies available that recognize different antigenic structures on a microorganism, with the restriction that those antigenic structures are characteristic only for that particular microorganism. In other situations, immunological typing is less useful. This is illustrated by the group of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli bacteria. While some of these pathogenic organisms are restricted to certain serotypes, the serotype is not a definitive indication that the organism is pathogenic. In this case, molecular biological analysis techniques are more informative. Usually, a combination of immunological and molecular biological techniques would be useful. The immunological techniques are easily performed and could in well defined cases be used as a screening procedure that could be followed up with a genetic based analysis. It should, however, be recalled that for the detection of toxins apart from the organisms that produce them, genetic analyses are not applicable.
机译:可以使用几种免疫学技术,例如ELISA或Western blotting,这些技术可以在现实的检测极限(即纳克至飞克级)范围内相对轻松,快速地鉴定微生物制剂。然而,在控制实验中,其他一些更难执行的技术,例如表面等离振子共振光谱技术,则允许检测抗原表位拓扑结构的细微变化,例如,如果它是突变体,则可以提供有关微生物特性的有价值的信息。这样的方法可以用作特定微生物菌株变异的第一个指示,但最后的证明必须通过遗传分析获得,例如PCR或核苷酸测序提供的信息。为了通过免疫学方法检测菌株变异,抗原变异必须反映菌株变异,并且必须有一组针对所有可能的抗原变异具有定义结合特性的抗体。这是一个必须满足的强大标准,但是一种方法可能是通过与所讨论抗原的保守或通用决定簇结合的分子生物学技术开发抗体,然后使用识别菌株差异的抗体对该方法进行后续研究。具有可用于识别微生物上不同抗原结构的一组抗体也是有用的,但要限制那些抗原结构仅对该特定微生物具有特征。在其他情况下,免疫分型不太有用。这由肠致病性大肠杆菌细菌群说明。尽管其中一些致病生物仅限于某些血清型,但血清型并不是该生物具有致病性的明确指示。在这种情况下,分子生物学分析技术将提供更多信息。通常,免疫学和分子生物学技术的结合将是有用的。免疫学技术易于实施,在明确定义的情况下可用作筛选程序,随后可进行基于遗传的分析。但是,应该记住,除了检测产生毒素的生物以外,对于检测毒素,基因分析是不适用的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号