首页> 外文会议>NATO advanced research workshops on maximizing the security and development benefits from the biological >MOLECULAR BIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES FOR SUBSPECIES IDENTIFICATION: IMMUNOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES A COMPARISON
【24h】

MOLECULAR BIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES FOR SUBSPECIES IDENTIFICATION: IMMUNOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES A COMPARISON

机译:亚种的分子生物学技术识别:免疫技术进行比较

获取原文

摘要

Several immunological techniques such as ELISA or western blotting are available that offer means of relatively easy and rapid identification of microbial agents at realistic limits of detection, that is, in the nanogram to femtogram ranges. Other techniques that are somewhat more difficult to perform such as surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy nevertheless in controlled experiments permit detection of subtle changes in antigen epitope topology that can provide valuable information about the character of the microorganism, for example, if it is a mutant. Such methods can be used as a first indication of variance by a particular strain of microorganism, but the last proof has to be obtained by genetic analysis, for example information provided by PCR or nucleotide sequencing. In order to detect strain variants by immunological methods, antigenic variation must reflect strain variation, and there must be a panel of antibodies available with defined binding properties for all different possible antigenic variants. This is a formidable criterion that has to be met, but one approach might be to develop antibodies through molecular biological techniques that bind to conserved or generic determinants of the antigen in question, and follow up this assay with another using antibodies recognizing strain differences. It would also be useful to have a panel of antibodies available that recognize different antigenic structures on a microorganism, with the restriction that those antigenic structures are characteristic only for that particular microorganism. In other situations, immunological typing is less useful. This is illustrated by the group of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli bacteria. While some of these pathogenic organisms are restricted to certain serotypes, the serotype is not a definitive indication that the organism is pathogenic. In this case, molecular biological analysis techniques are more informative. Usually, a combination of immunological and molecular biological techniques would be useful. The immunological techniques are easily performed and could in well defined cases be used as a screening procedure that could be followed up with a genetic based analysis. It should, however, be recalled that for the detection of toxins apart from the organisms that produce them, genetic analyses are not applicable.
机译:诸如ELISA或Western印迹之类的几种免疫学技术可用于提供在逼真的检测范围内的微生物剂相对容易和快速鉴定的方法,即在纳米图中到映射范围。然而,在受控实验中迄今为止在诸如表面等离子体共振光谱的诸如表面等离子体共振光谱的其他技术允许检测抗原表位拓扑的细微变化,其可以提供关于微生物的特征的有价值的信息,例如,如果是突变体。这些方法可以用作通过微生物的特定菌株的差异的第一指示,但是必须通过遗传分析获得最后的证据,例如由PCR或核苷酸测序提供的信息。为了通过免疫方法检测应变变体,抗原变异必须反映应变变化,并且必须有一个抗体面板,具有用于所有不同可能的抗原变体的限定的结合性。这是必须满足的强大标准,但是一种方法可以是通过与所问题的抗原的保守或通用决定簇结合的分子生物学技术来开发抗体,并使用识别应变差异的抗体跟进该测定。在微生物上识别出识别不同的抗原结构的抗体面板也是有用的,其中限制这些抗原结构仅针对该特定微生物的特征。在其他情况下,免疫键入不太有用。这由肠致原性大肠杆菌细菌组说明。虽然这些致病生物中的一些限于某些血清型,但血清型不是有机体是致病性的最终指示。在这种情况下,分子生物学分析技术更有信息。通常,免疫和分子生物技术的组合将是有用的。易于进行免疫学技术,并且可以在明确定义的情况下用作可以随访的基于遗传分析的筛选程序。但是,应该回顾一下,对于从产生它们的生物体分开的毒素的检测,遗传分析不适用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号