【24h】

ECOTOXICOLOGICAL HAZARD ASSESSMENT OF SOLID-PHASE SAMPLES

机译:固相样品的生态毒理学危害评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The legislative control and prediction of hazardous effects in soils and sediments are mainly based on chemical data on the level of selected hazardous key pollutants. This approach has some limitations: inability to account for the bioavailability of the contaminants and foresee the interactive effects of pollutants in complex matrixes. Also there is always the risk of poor selection of the contaminants to be measured. However, additional biological end ecological tests enable to compose a more objective picture of the environmental hazard. Due to the complexity of ecosystems and multifunctional character of toxicity per se which can be chemical, species- and end-point dependent variable, the assessment of polluted wastewaters and soils is recommended to be performed by using several organisms of different trophic levels. However, the selection of a suitable test battery is not a trivial task. With the appearance of new generation of biotesting means, so-called microbiotests, the biological approach to assessing environmental pollution could become a powerful counterpart to the chemical one. Currently ecotoxicological testing (fish, daphnia and algal tests) is introduced in the EC legislation only for the analysis of new chemicals (EC Directive 67/548, 7th amendment 92/32).
机译:对土壤和沉积物中有害影响的立法控制和预测主要基于选定有害关键污染物水平的化学数据。这种方法有一些局限性:无法说明污染物的生物利用度,无法预见污染物在复杂基质中的相互作用。此外,总是存在选择的待测污染物选择不当的风险。但是,额外的生物学最终生态学测试可以使人们更加客观地了解环境危害。由于生态系统的复杂性和毒性本身的多功能性(可能是化学的,物种和终点的变量),建议使用几种营养水平不同的生物进行污染废水和土壤的评估。但是,选择合适的测试电池并不是一件容易的事。随着新一代生物测试手段(所谓的微生物测试)的出现,用于评估环境污染的生物学方法可能会成为化学方法的有力替代品。目前,EC法规中仅引入了生态毒理学测试(鱼类,水蚤和藻类测试),用于分析新化学物质(EC指令67/548,第7修正案92/32)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号