【24h】

TIME, CLOSED TIMELIKE CURVES AND CAUSALITY

机译:时间,封闭的时间曲线和因果关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

GTR has been an extremely successful theory, with a well established experimental footing, at least for weak gravitational fields. Its predictions range from the existence of black holes and gravitational radiation to the cosmological models, which predict a primordial beginning, namely the big-bang. However, it was seen that it is possible to find solutions to the EFEs, with certain ease, which generate CTCs. This implies that if we consider GTR valid, we need to include the possibility of time travel in the form of CTCs. A typical reaction is to exclude time travel due to the associated paradoxes. But the paradoxes do not prove that time travel is mathematically or physically impossible. Consistent mathematical solutions to the EFEs have been found, based on plausible physical processes. What they do seem to indicate is that local information in spacetimes containing CTCs are restricted in unfamiliar ways. The grandfather paradox, without doubt, does indicate some strange aspects of spacetimes that contain CTCs. It is logically inconsistent that the time traveller murders his grandfather. But, one can ask, what exactly prevented him from accomplishing his murderous act if he had ample opportunities and the free will to do so. It seems that certain conditions in local events are to be fulfilled for the solution to be globally self-consistent. These conditions are denoted consistency constraints. To eliminate the problem of free will, mechanical systems were developed, such as the self-collision of billiard balls in the presence of CTCs. These do not convey the associated philosophical speculations on free will related to human beings. Much has been written on two possible remedies to the paradoxes, namely the Principle of Self-Consistency and the Chronology Protection Conjecture. Igor Novikov is a leading advocate for the Principle of Self-Consistency, which stipulates that events on a CTC are self-consistent, i.e., events influence one another along the curve in a cyclic and self-consistent way. In the presence of CTCs the distinction between past and future events is ambiguous, and the definitions considered in the causal structure of well-behaved spacetimes break down. What is important to note is that events in the future can influence, but cannot change, events in the past. The Principle of Self-Consistency permits one to construct local solutions of the laws of physics, only if these can be prolonged to a unique global solution, defined throughout non-singular regions of spacetime. Therefore, according to this principle, the only solutions of the laws of physics that are allowed locally, reinforced by the consistency constraints, are those which are globally self-consistent. Hawking's Chronology Protection Conjecture is a more conservative way of dealing with the paradoxes. Hawking notes the strong experimental evidence in favour of the conjecture from the fact that "we have not been invaded by hordes of tourists from the future". An analysis reveals that the renormalized expectation value of the quantum stress-energy tensor diverges as one gets close to CTC formation. This conjecture permits the existence of traversable wormoles, but prohibits the appearance of CTCs. The transformation of a wormhole into a time machine results in enormous effects of the vacuum polarization, which destroys its internal structure. There is no convincing demonstration of the Chronology Protection Conjecture, but the hope exists that a future theory of quantum gravity may prohibit CTCs.
机译:GTR是非常成功的理论,至少在弱重力领域具有良好的实验基础。它的预测范围从黑洞和引力辐射的存在到宇宙学模型,宇宙学模型预测了原始的开始,即大爆炸。但是,可以看出,可以很容易地找到生成CTC的EFE的解决方案。这意味着,如果我们认为GTR有效,则需要以CTC的形式包括时间旅行的可能性。典型的反应是排除由于相关的悖论引起的时间旅行。但是,悖论并不能证明时间旅行在数学或物理上都是不可能的。基于合理的物理过程,已经找到了EFE的一致数学解。他们似乎的确表明,时空中包含四氯化碳的本地信息以不熟悉的方式受到限制。毫无疑问,祖父悖论确实表明了包含CTC的时空的某些奇怪方面。从逻辑上讲,时间旅行者谋杀了他的祖父。但是,有人会问,如果他有足够的机会和这样做的自由意志,到底是什么因素使他无法完成他的杀人行为。似乎要满足本地事件中的某些条件,才能使解决方案在全球范围内具有一致性。这些条件表示为一致性约束。为了消除自由意志的问题,开发了机械系统,例如在存在CTC的情况下撞撞台球。这些并未传达与人类有关的自由意志的相关哲学推测。关于自相矛盾的两种可能的补救方法,即“自洽原则”和“时序保护猜想”,已经有很多论述。伊戈尔·诺维科夫(Igor Novikov)是“自洽原则”的主要倡导者,该原则规定CTC上的事件是自洽的,即,事件以一种周期性且自洽的方式沿曲线相互影响。在存在CTC的情况下,过去事件与未来事件之间的区别是模棱两可的,并且行为良好的时空的因果结构中考虑的定义被打破了。需要注意的是,未来的事件可以影响但不能改变过去的事件。自洽原理允许人们构造物理定律的局部解,前提是这些局部解可以扩展到在时空的非奇异区域定义的唯一全局解。因此,根据这一原理,在局部一致性允许的情况下,局部允许的唯一物理法则解决方案是全局自洽的。霍金的时序保护猜想是应对这种悖论的一种更为保守的方法。霍金指出,“我们尚未受到来自未来的成群游客的入侵”这一事实,为这一推测提供了有力的实验证据。分析表明,量子应力-能量张量的重新归一化期望值随着接近CTC的形成而发散。这种推测允许存在可穿越的虫子,但禁止CTC的出现。将虫洞转换为时间机器会导致真空极化的巨大影响,从而破坏其内部结构。没有说服力保护猜想的令人信服的证明,但是人们希望未来的量子引力理论可以禁止CTC。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号