【24h】

Heating Efficiency of Debundled Carbon Nanotubes Compared to Carbon Black

机译:与碳黑相比,解束的碳纳米管的加热效率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Carbon nanotubes can be used as heat generating sources when stimulated by infrared light. However, nanotubes aggregate significantly, which may reduce thermal output. This paper compares temperature increases for bundled and separated nanotubes in aqueous media. Further, nano-sized carbon black is compared to carbon nanotubes to determine if nanotubes are more efficient heaters. Results Carbon nanotubes have strong absorption in the infrared, where body tissues are most transparent. Due to their high aspect ratio, nanotubes behave as antenna, [1] a property which should increase their efficiency to couple to incident radiation and in turn generate heat. Recent literature has shown that single- wall carbon nanotubes, in the presence of infrared stimulation, are able to generate enough heat to kill cells in vitro. [2] Therefore, the use of nanotubes for highly-localized thermal ablation therapies seems promising. Carbon nanotubes are hydrophobic and bundle easily and this may affect their absorption and heating efficiency, especially in aqueous media. For biological applications, nanotubes are typically functionalized to inhibit bundling; however, this may affect biological response, and for heat comparisons with carbon black, it is appropriate for all materials to be unfunctionalized. Although it has been shown that nanotubes conduct heat better than carbon black [3-5] no results have yet shown that nanotubes generate heat better following infrared absorption than other carbon materials. Surfactants are employed to aid in the dispersion of the nanomaterials although nanotubes could likewise be wrapped with DNA,[6] or polysaccharides. [7]
机译:碳纳米管在红外光的刺激下可用作热源。然而,纳米管显着聚集,这可能降低热输出。本文比较了水性介质中成束和分离的纳米管的温度升高。此外,将纳米级炭黑与碳纳米管进行比较,以确定纳米管是否是更有效的加热器。结果碳纳米管在人体组织最透明的红外线中具有强吸收性。由于纳米管的长径比高,其表现为天线[1],该属性应提高其耦合到入射辐射并产生热量的效率。最近的文献表明,在存在红外刺激的情况下,单壁碳纳米管能够产生足够的热量以杀死体外的细胞。 [2]因此,将纳米管用于高度局部的热消融治疗似乎很有希望。碳纳米管是疏水性的,容易捆绑,这可能会影响其吸收和加热效率,尤其是在水性介质中。对于生物应用,通常对纳米管进行功能化以抑制束缚。但是,这可能会影响生物学反应,并且与炭黑进行热比较时,适合所有材料都未功能化。尽管已经显示出纳米管比炭黑[3-5]具有更好的导热性,但尚未有结果表明在吸收红外线后,纳米管比其他碳材料产生的热更好。尽管纳米管同样可以被DNA [6]或多糖包裹,但仍使用表面活性剂来辅助纳米材料的分散。 [7]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号