首页> 外文会议>ASME International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering >THE INFLUENCE OF NON-PRESCRIPTIVE LEGISLATION IN THE EVOLUTION OF OFFSHORE WELL INTEGRITY PRACTICES: AN EXPLORATORY REVIEW
【24h】

THE INFLUENCE OF NON-PRESCRIPTIVE LEGISLATION IN THE EVOLUTION OF OFFSHORE WELL INTEGRITY PRACTICES: AN EXPLORATORY REVIEW

机译:非规范性立法在离岸诚信实践演变中的影响:探索性评论

获取原文

摘要

Among the stochastic tools and risk analysis techniques, ALARP (As Low As Reasonably Practicable) concept has proved to be the most influential guidance regarding the development of regulations and standards of the offshore industry in terms of risk assessment and consequently of equipment integrity. The reasons for that can be traced back to early seventies, when the British Health and Safety Executive (HSE) released its seminal document "The Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974". The 1974 Act was the first regulation to adopt a non-prescriptive approach as a basis to configure the ruling legislation of industrial activities. Since then, risk analysis methods have encountered a vast field of opportunities in the wide range of options proportionated by such framework. In this sense, the Safety Case and the NORSOK standards play a significant role in the non-prescriptive approach application in the offshore industry. The present work discusses the influence of these two frameworks in the definition of the current Brazilian offshore legislation, especially in terms of the design, tests, and monitoring of the so called Solidary Well Barriers throughout the well life cycle. The United States legislation, largely reviewed after the Macondo accident, will be used to counterpoint the prescriptive and non-prescriptive approaches.
机译:在随机工具和风险分析技术中,ALARP(尽可能低,合理可行)概念已被证明是在风险评估的风险评估方面和设备完整性方面的关于海外行业的法规和标准的最有影响力的指导。当英国健康和安全执行(HSE)发布其开放文件“工作等法案”时,英国卫生和安全执行(HSE)追溯到七十年代早期的原因。 1974年法案是采用非规定方法作为配置工业活动统治立法的基础的第一个规定。从那时起,风险分析方法遇到了广泛的机会领域,这些框架大部分的各种选择。从这个意义上讲,安全案例和Norsok标准在离岸行业的非规定方法应用中起着重要作用。本作本作讨论了这两个框架在目前巴西海上立法的定义中的影响,特别是在设计,测试和监测方面,在整个井生命周期中所谓的整体井障碍。在Macondo事故后,美国立法在很大程度上审查,将用于对比规范和非规定的方法进行争论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号