首页> 外文会议>Symposium on detection limits in air quality and environmental measurements >Treatment of Non-Detects Can Lead to Inaccurate Forensic Conclusions
【24h】

Treatment of Non-Detects Can Lead to Inaccurate Forensic Conclusions

机译:非检测的治疗可能导致不准确的法医结论

获取原文

摘要

Collecting samples from a contaminated site, characterizing background, and considering potential sources are integral parts of both traditional site assessments and environmental forensic investigations, yet the objectives of these investigations differ. Whereas traditional site assessments generally aim to characterize the nature and extent of contamination and assess the resultant risks, the goal of forensic investigations is to identify contributing sources of contamination, including influences from local or regional background. Typical methods for handling non-detect (ND) results for site characterization work are less appropriate for forensic investigations because their influence on the forensic analyses and final conclusions is unpredictable. Detection limits (consistency, values, and treatment of) are of particular importance in forensic studies where presence or absence of one contaminant may be the characteristic that distinguishes different sources. Although substitution methods for handling ND results may be appropriate in the context of risk assessment, this approach may obscure the true forensic characteristics of the underlying sources and measured sample compositions if applied in a forensic investigation, ultimately resulting in erroneous conclusions about sources. Through case studies, we demonstrate how various methods for handling detection limits can change the conclusions drawn from common forensic analyses. The effect of substituting numeric values for NDs on the results of common chemical forensics multivariate analyses is illustrated using simulated data and example soil samples from Colorado and Washington. The analyses discussed demonstrate a variety of impacts on multivariate analyses that stem only from changes in how ND results were included and illustrate the potential for inaccurate conclusions about the true forensic features within the data. Recommendations are provided for how to investigate and identify the impact of NDs on chemical forensic multivariate analyses.
机译:从受污染的部位收集样品,表征背景,考虑潜在来源是传统地点评估和环境法医调查的组成部分,但这些调查的目标不同。而传统的现场评估一般旨在表征污染的性质和程度,并评估所产生的风险,法医调查的目标是确定污染源的污染源,包括当地或区域背景的影响。用于处理现场表征工作的非检测(ND)结果的典型方法不太适合法医调查,因为它们对法医分析的影响和最终结论是不可预测的。检测限(一致性,值和治疗)在法医学研究中特别重要,其中一个污染物的存在或不存在可能是区分不同来源的特征。虽然在风险评估的情况下,用于处理ND结果的替代方法可能是适当的,但如果在法医调查中应用,这种方法可能会掩盖潜在来源和测量样品组合物的真正法医特性,最终导致了关于来源的错误结论。通过案例研究,我们展示了如何处理检测限制的各种方法可以改变来自常见法医分析的结论。使用模拟数据说明了NDS在常见化学质量多变量分析结果上取代数值的影响,并使用来自科罗拉多州和华盛顿的土壤样本来说明常见化学质量分析。讨论的分析展示了对多变量分析的各种影响,该分析仅源于ND结果如何包括ND结果的变化,并说明了关于数据内的真正法医特征的不准确性的可能性。提供了如何调查和确定NDS对化学法医多变量分析的影响的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号