首页> 外文会议>Joint annual meeting of the International Society of Exposure Science and the International Society for Environmental Epidemiology >Does Climate Matter? How Temperature and Precipitation Affect the Relationship between Neighbourhood Walkability and Walking for Transportation
【24h】

Does Climate Matter? How Temperature and Precipitation Affect the Relationship between Neighbourhood Walkability and Walking for Transportation

机译:气候值吗?温度和降水量如何影响邻里步行者之间的关系,行走运输

获取原文

摘要

Previous research has found associations between neighbourhood walkability and transport walking, which has health benefits. However, the influence of climate on these associations is poorly understood. Our objective is to examine how climate modifies the association between walkability and walking to work or school across Canada. We hypothesize that this association is weaker in areas with more extreme climates. The study population is from the 2007-2014 Canadian Community Health Surveys, ongoing cross-sectional surveys of Canadians aged 12 and up. We excluded people who lived in rural areas or did not work or attend school. These surveys collect self-reported data on socio-demographics and transport walking. Climate data are 1981-2010 climate normals from weather stations across Canada and walkability data are Walk Score? values of respondents' residential locations. We estimated associations between walkability (split into quintiles) and energy expenditure on walking to work/school, adjusting for socio-demographics. To examine how climate modifies this association, we will incorporate the following variables into these models: mean temperature in hottest and coldest months, mean precipitation in wettest and driest months, days per year and degree days over and under specific temperatures. The mean energy expenditure on walking to work/school was 0.26 kcal/kg/day among people in the highest walkability quintile, compared to 0.08 kcal/kg/day in the lowest quintile. After adjusting for socio-demographics, the difference in energy expenditure was 0.17 kcal/kg/day (95% confidence interval [0.15-0.18]). Climate variables will be incorporated into these models, with results forthcoming. On average, people living in more walkable neighbourhoods walk to work or school more than people in less walkable neighbourhoods. Incorporation of climate variables into this analysis will inform whether climate should be considered when evaluating walkability and physical activity.
机译:以前的研究发现了邻里可行性和运输之间的关联,具有健康益处。然而,气候对这些协会的影响很差。我们的目标是探讨气候如何修改自行车之间的协会,并在加拿大走向上班或学校。我们假设这种关联在具有更极端气候的地区较弱。研究人口来自2007 - 2014年加拿大社区健康调查,加拿大人持续的加拿大人横断面调查。我们排除了住在农村地区或不工作或上学的人。这些调查收集了关于社会人口统计数据和运输步行的自我报告的数据。气候数据是1981-2010加拿大天气站的气候法线,步行数据是步行分数?受访者住宅位数的价值观。我们估计了可行性(分解为Quintiles)和步行工作/学校的能源支出之间的协会,调整社会人口统计学。为了检查气候如何修改本协会,我们将把以下变量纳入这些模型:最热门和最冷的月平均温度,在最潮湿和最干燥的月份,每年最干燥的月份,每年的日子和度数在特定温度下的日子。步行前往工作/学校的平均能源支出为最高可行性昆币的0.26kcal / kg /天,相比最低五分之一的0.08 kcal / kg /天。调整社会人口统计数据后,能源支出的差异为0.17千卡/千克/天(95%置信区间[0.15-0.18])。气候变量将被纳入这些模型,即将到来的结果。平均而言,生活在更可行的街区的人们在不那么可行的邻居中散步到上班或学校。将气候变量纳入此分析将通知如何在评估可行性和身体活动时考虑气候。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号