首页> 外文会议>SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium >Comparison Study of Capillary Pressure Curves Obtained Using Traditional Centrifuge and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Techniques
【24h】

Comparison Study of Capillary Pressure Curves Obtained Using Traditional Centrifuge and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Techniques

机译:传统离心机和磁共振成像技术获得的毛细管压力曲线的比较研究

获取原文

摘要

The current study is a comparison trial of a new Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) method for acquiring capillary pressure versus traditional techniques. This study is meant to evaluate the methodology and workflow by performing measurements at the University of New Brunswick, Canada and on-site with CoreLab in Houston, TX, USA. This study focuses on gas-brine primary drainage capillary pressure systems. Traditional centrifuge capillary pressure measurements require the fluid(s) to reach equilibrium at many different speeds. This is very time consuming as each equilibrium step can take a couple of days. In addition, the inlet saturation must be computed using an approximate solution that is known to cause errors. Porous plate capillary pressure measurements are considered the most accurate but acquiring the complete curve can take months. The new method (GIT-CAP) centrifuges the core plugs then directly measures the water saturation distribution inside the core plug using MRI. The measured water saturation together with the known centrifugal force directly leads to a capillary pressure curve. Conventional medical based MRI methods have difficulty in relating the detected signal intensity to water or oil saturation. This is because the MRI image intensity depends on the environment of hydrogen atoms which changes based on saturation level. In this work, we use a new MRI method, one dimensional centric scan Single-point Ramped Imaging with T1 Enhancement (SPRITE), in which the detected signal is directly proportional to the amount of water or oil present. The new technique measures the capillary pressure curve more quickly and accurately. It is also three to five times faster since only two to three centrifuge speeds are required (versus seven to ten). In some rock types, this reduces the measurement duration from many weeks to days. The new technique is also potentially more accurate as it directly measures the water saturation in the rock instead of relying on a calculation using a measurement of the expelled water. The current study focuses on gas-water systems comparing traditional capillary pressure measurements with the new MRI-based method.
机译:目前的研究是用于获取毛细管压力与传统技术的新磁共振成像(MRI)方法的比较试验。本研究旨在通过在美国休斯顿休斯顿的新布鲁尼克,加拿大和CoreLab进行CoreLab进行测量来评估方法和工作流程。本研究重点介绍气盐初级排水毛细管压系统。传统的离心机压力测量需要液体以不同的速度达到平衡。这非常耗时,因为每个均衡步骤可能需要几天。另外,必须使用已知会导致错误的近似解来计算入口饱和度。多孔板毛细管压力测量被认为是最准确但是收购完整的曲线可能需要数月。新方法(GIT-CAP)离心芯插塞,然后使用MRI直接测量核心插头内的水饱和分布。测量的水饱和与已知的离心力一起直接导致毛细管压力曲线。传统的基于医疗的MRI方法难以将检测到的信号强度与水或油饱和度相关。这是因为MRI图像强度取决于氢原子的环境,基于饱和度改变。在这项工作中,我们使用新的MRI方法,具有T1增强(精灵)的一维中心扫描单点斜坡成像,其中检测信号与存在的水或油量成比例。新技术更快可准确地测量毛细管压力曲线。它的速度快三达五倍,因为只需要两到三到三个离心速度(与七到十)。在一些岩石类型中,这会降低数周到的测量持续时间。新技术也可能更准确,因为它直接测量岩石中的水饱和而不是使用排出的水的测量来依赖于计算。目前的研究侧重于燃气系统与新的基于MRI的方法比较传统毛细管压力测量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号