首页> 外文会议>Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting >Comparison of Three Avionics Systems Based Upon Information Availability, Priorities and Accessibility
【24h】

Comparison of Three Avionics Systems Based Upon Information Availability, Priorities and Accessibility

机译:基于信息可用性,优先级和可访问性的三个航空电子系统的比较

获取原文

摘要

This study evaluates three avionics systems typically found in small general aviation aircraft. The evaluation included a traditional “steam gauge” airplane, an “intermediate” airplane equipped with traditional mechanical instruments along with a GPS-based moving map display and a technically advanced airplane equipped with a computer-based glass cockpit. We evaluated the avionics using a methodology described by Schvanevelt, Berringer & Leard (2004) which evaluates the availability and accessibility of information based upon the priorities pilots place upon the various information sources. The results show that computer-based avionics provide more information; however most of the additional information is located deep within the avionics’ menu structure.
机译:本研究评估了通常在小型通用航空飞机中发现的三个航空电子系统。评估包括传统的“Steam Cauge”飞机,一个“中间”飞机,配备了传统的机械仪器,以及基于GPS的移动地图显示器和配备有计算机玻璃驾驶舱的技术先进的飞机。我们使用Schvanevelt,Berringer&Leard(2004)描述的方法评估了航空电子设备,该方法基于优先购率的Play Play在各种信息来源上评估信息的可用性和可访问性。结果表明,基于计算机的航空电子提供了更多信息;然而,大多数附加信息都位于航空电子设备的菜单结构中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号