首页> 外文会议>Annual Water Environment Federation technical exhibition and conference >Quantitative Comparison of Active and Passive Stormwater Infrastructure: Case Study in Beckley, West Virginia
【24h】

Quantitative Comparison of Active and Passive Stormwater Infrastructure: Case Study in Beckley, West Virginia

机译:主动和被动雨水基础设施的定量比较:西弗吉尼亚贝克利案例研究

获取原文

摘要

The purpose of this work is to describe through quantitative performance analyses how enabling water resources infrastructure to use data, make decisions, and adapt their behavior in real time makes watershed management more effective and efficient. Herein we compare two different types of stormwater detention ponds, a traditional passive pond and an active pond on which continuous monitoring and adaptive control (CMAC) has been implemented. For the CMAC pond, real site performance data was used from a detention pond in Beckley, West Virginia. For the passive pond, a hydraulic simulation was performed using watershed and basin characteristics identical to the CMAC pond. For a six-month analysis period, we compared the performance of the CMAC pond and the passive pond with respect to water quality, channel protection, and flood mitigation metrics. Conclusions include that optimizing stormwater infrastructure to be active instead of passive yields improved water quality, increased channel protection, and a reduction in flood risk.
机译:这项工作的目的是通过定量性能分析来描述如何实时使用数据,做出决策,使其行为进行水资源基础设施使流域管理更加有效和高效。在此,我们比较了两种不同类型的雨水拘留池,传统的被动池和一个活跃的池塘已经实施了连续监测和自适应控制(CMAC)。对于CMAC池塘,现场性能数据被从西弗吉尼亚州贝克利的拘留池中使用。对于被动池,使用流域和与CMAC池塘相同的盆地特征进行液压模拟。对于六个月的分析期,我们将CMAC池塘和被动池的性能与水质,通道保护和洪水缓解指标进行了比较。结论包括优化雨水基础设施的活跃而不是被动产生的水质,增加的渠道保护以及洪水风险的降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号